Rit 2021. gads, bet mācību grāmatās un mācību materiālos internetā kā akmenī kalta ir dzīva aš pirms 200 gadiem Morgana izdomātā, un tad Engelsa retranslētā shēma “egalitārais pirmatnējais bars > egalitārā dzimtas kopiena > zemkopju cilts, mantiskā noslāņošanās un valdniecība”. Vēstures zinātnē gana sen no šīs primitīvās formulas visa atteikusies kā aplamas, taču ziņa līdz dievzemītei vēl nav atnākusi. Tb marksisma formulas turpina iekalt no mazotnes, un tad brīnās, cik shematiski pieaugušie “domā”.

"(..) Clearly, it no longer makes any sense to use phrases like ‘the agricultural revolution’ when dealing with processes of such inordinate length and complexity. Since there was no Eden-like state, from which the first farmers could take their first steps on the road to inequality, it makes even less sense to talk about agriculture as marking the origins of rank or private property. If anything, it is among those populations – the ‘Mesolithic’ peoples – who refused farming through the warming centuries of the early Holocene, that we find stratification becoming more entrenched; at least, if opulent burial, predatory warfare, and monumental buildings are anything to go by. In at least some cases, like the Middle East, the first farmers seem to have consciously developed alternative forms of community, to go along with their more labour-intensive way of life. These Neolithic societies look strikingly egalitarian when compared to their hunter-gatherer neighbours, with a dramatic increase in the economic and social importance of women, clearly reflected in their art and ritual life (contrast here the female figurines of Jericho or Çatalhöyük with the hyper-masculine sculpture of Göbekli Tepe). (..)"