Gribēju šodien uzrakstīt kaut ko depresīvu, taču pārdomāju.
Kā jau rakstīju, maita pirms kāda laiciņa atsūtīja man meilu ar virsrakstu «Are
We Alone in the Universe? Solar system may be one of a kind.» Viss, kas tur bija – kāds
mazs jociņš un saite uz /. Savukārt Slashdot atradās
mazs
rakstiņš un daudz komentāru. Tie arī, protams, bija tā interesantākā daļa. Diemžēl ar navigēšanos
starp komentāriem es īsti galā netiku, tāpēc pilnīgi visus izlasīt neizdevās. Lai nu kā, šeit ir interesantākās
domas. Gan par, gan pret.
Lasīt grūti nebija, nav tur pilns ar visādiem specifiskiem terminiem vai ko tādu, taču.. Vai tiešām
viņiem skolās angļu angļu vai amerikāņu angļu valodas stundās NEKO nemāca par komatu
pareizu lietošanu?
eric99: Maybe we are looking
for the wrong sort of thing. Who is to say another life form even has a physical body.
On the other hand, I am not so sure finding another form of life outside of Earth is such a good idea.
We have a hard enough time getting along with people on the other side of our own planet.
Alan Partridge:
You agree? I'll tell you why we haven't found any E.T. life; – it's because we're incredibly
primitive and haven't really made any reasonable attempt at looking. Even SETI admit that if
there was a planet exactly like Earth orbiting Alpha Centauri they could not detect it. If we can't detect
a civilisation like ours in one of our nearest neighbour stars, how the hell could we search thew rest
of the galaxy, let alone the rest of the universe?
Let there be no doubt, the universe is FULL of life, we're just too primitive to see it.
<Anonymous Coward>:
Actually I think the most important fact that points to the (relative) uniqueness of the Sol system
is that it is a failed binary system. Yes, that is the case. Saturn and Jupiter are a failed star.
(Red. x-f piez. – ūja!) Accretion was probably
to slow or some body in the near extra-system area caused tidal forces to delay the process. If I recall
correctly the vast majority of the star systems are binary, the presence of gas giants, however, points
to other cases of failed solar accretion. The question thus becomes, what is the proportion of failed
binary systems ? It is unlikely that an earth like rock would exist in a full binary as the tidal and
radioactive forces would create inhospitable zones to large to statistically accomodate a planet over
billions of years. Our own habitable zone is decreasing as the sun ages and burns its limitited fuel.
Having two stars would eat away at any habitable zone from two sides. In addition to these problems,
many systems with gas giants may as yet devellop stars or quasi stars. In fact Jupiter is constantly
on the "verge" of ignition, hence the massive
radiation output, were it at some stage to change it's relationship with Saturn ignition is a serious
posibility. As the sun grows and its output increases this may trigger such an event. (Red.
x-f piez. – pārlasi vēlreiz divus iepriekšējos teikumus. biedējoši ne?) All
in all it seems unlikely that life evolved only on earth. I personally believe that the basics of
life started on a dirty snowball in the van Oort Cloud. These balls exist all over the Galaxy let
alone the universe. I doubt however that "they" exist near us in either space or time.
The scales are just too big. Even if they are there here and now, the distances make contact impractical
at best, uneconomical in reality.
RatBastard:
We may be the first intellegent life to exist in the universe. Or we may be the first ones to live
past the developement of nuclear weapons. Or we might be the first ones not killed off by a asteroid
colliding with our planet, or a plague, or a massive volcanic eruption, etc... It doesn't take a
whole hell of a lot to kill a species off. We can't even count the number of near misses the human
race survived.
The universe is massive and ancient. It is also heartless and dangerous.
Xeriar: The Solar system is a mineral-rich system (for Sol's size) in a mineral-rich
galaxy.
Minerals are good, they allow for life, production and the pursuit of happiness. They're also bad,
they mean meteors and lots of them.
nofx_3: You are making some serious assumptions about the needs of life. Life does
not have to be like us, and it needn't require things like heavy metals. It might just be something
we couldn't imagine in our wildest dreams.
Nedaudz filosofijas un daži jociņi arī. :)
sniggly: There are these scientists that deny something if it can't be proven to
exist. That's the wrong way around, something can exist unless you can actually prove circumstances
under which it can't exist. There's no way to prove and convince everyone of anything so the whole
point of proving what's real and what's not is totally futile unless you want to control people's reality
in a religious sense. Science should stay away from proving what doesn't exists and stick to providing
us with engineering challenges.
RazzleFrog: How about looking at it this way. I have a Mix CD here with 20 songs spread out
over the last 60 years (big band to Korn – don't ask). Now based on the huge number of CD's that have
been burned since CD-burners have become common place I believe that someone must have created the
identical CD (same songs and order of songs). But based on my sample size of one I will never know
until I find someone with the same mix.
CreatureComfort: Except to push your analogy a little farther, not only have the
SETI people not found a CD with the same mix, they haven't even found anyone else with a CD
burner.
jonskerr: Look where I'm pointing! Don't you see 'em? Look! Just because you can't
see them doesn't mean they're not there.
What do you mean you can't see these 'atoms', Mr Newton? Newton wouldn't have denied the existence
of atoms as the basic building blocks of matter just because no one could conclusively prove they existed
at the time.
<Anonymous Coward>: Hey, it is even hard to find intelligent life on this
planet.
jyoull: can we google the universe for life?
rsadelle: Sure we can. We just have to finish building the index
first.
No manis.
Ja Tu nezini, kas ir SETI, es ar Tevi nerunāšu. :)
Par to, vai mēs esam vieni vai nē. Es domāju, ka neesam vieni. Visums ir tik milzīgs, ka ir maz ticams,
ka dzīvība varētu būt apsēdusi tikai vienu pašu planētu. :) Maz ticams, jo Tas patiešām ir milzonīgs
(vēlreiz iesaku pārlasīt hope.less skaidrojumu
par Visuma formu un apjomu). Protams, ļoti maza iespēja, ka tā varētu kaut nedaudz līdzināties Zemes
dzīvībai. O2 tai var būt nāvējošs, Zemes vidējā gaisa temperatūra
+18°C (šķiet) – stindzinoša vai neizturama svelme, gaisa spiediens – daudz par daudz
vai vakuums, Saules starojums, mākoņi, vēji, gāzes, .. Tāpat arī saprāts. To nevar
iedomāties. Bet nedomāju, ka esam vieni. «I
want to believe» – no X failu plakāta Maldera un Skallijas kabinetā.
Vēl viena lietiņa. Ja nu Zemes kosmosa kuģis aizlido līdz kādai planētai un atrod tur dzīvību, kā var
noteikt, vai tā ir analoģiska Zemes cilvēkiem vai Zemes dzīvniekiem? :)
nebūtība: mēs esam C dzīvības..
2004. gada 13. augusts, 7:35 pm, 2 atbildes / atbildēt