[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends View]
Below are 25 friends' journal entries, after skipping by the 25 most recent ones.
| Saturday, November 23rd, 2024 | ||
|
gnidrologs |
6:00p | Ievērojam kā bagātie un varenie nekad nav resni. Ēd pilnīgi citu pārtiku, nekā to, ko pārdod plebam. Ļoti šaubos, ka viņi visi tur ir baigie sportisti, vnk nelietot augu eļļas, konservantus u.c. širpatreba indes, kuras tirgo viņu īpašumā esošās korporācijas. Ēd svaigu, tikko no kūts vai pļavas gaļu, kuru cenšas aizliegt/padārdzināt ierindas cilvēkiem. |
|
zazis |
5:48p | Dienas citāts no reddita dzīlēm. "Love gets more when we share it. Explain that with your science and logic and math and stuff!" |
|
virginia_rabbit |
9:59a | mazie saldumuņi sēž pie brokastu galda un dzied: zilonītis gaisā skrēja |
| Friday, November 22nd, 2024 | ||
|
zazis |
11:36p | Sliktas ziņas tiem, kas lasa sliktas ziņas. Poor mental health linked to browsing negative content online. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2024/nov/poo |
| divas_zosis | 10:24p | Lapsa Jāņavārtos skrien pāri sliedēm. Pasīka, izkāmējusi... |
|
honeybee |
8:41p | klau, tie, kas zina mūziku, kas ir jauns un labs iekš emo-heavy-rock kategorijas ar drusku industrial/metal? think "linkin park - SOAD - drusk limp bizkit - kkas no marylin manson, bet mēs viņu vairs nelietojam - (nin un agrīno einstuerzende neviens neaizstās) - greenday?" un pie muse apstājamies, jo es nupat pamēģināju muse un tas ir tikpat eugh kā bija tad, kad viņu pirmoreiz pamēģināju vārdsakot, come on, nevar būt, ka viss no jaunā, kas kaut pietuvojas šim žanram, ir billie eilish un 21 pilots sirsnībā, wannabe vecmāmiņa |
| divas_zosis | 4:06p | Reinika stulbais projekts. |
| Thursday, November 21st, 2024 | ||
|
covid_19 |
11:10p | turpinot par dūni ok, saprātīgās mašiņas beigušās, spaiss plūst, ja var tā noprast, tad space gyild ir pilnā plaukumā un navigatori melanžu ēd kā elpo, jo kosmiskie ceļojumi notiek un bez mašīnām .... tad kur spaiss filmā? bene gesserit savas spējas pastiprināja ar spaisu - līdzīgi kā hasasīni ieguva kontaktu ar dievu ēdot hašišu (jā tolaik hašišu ēda) un meditējot, tāpec viņus sāka saukt par hasasīniem nevis asasīniem ;-) kur melanžs? filmā? kā bene geserit var atvērt savas spējas, ja viņu fiška ir redzēt vēsturi caur sieviešu genofondu un tādējādi radot savu ģenētisko plānu |
|
begemots |
11:08p | * * * Pilnmēness taču it kā beidzies? 👀 |
|
snauts |
11:13p | Šodien braucu mājās ap kādiem pusdesmitiem pāri Vanšu tiltam ar velosipēdu. Ķīpsalas pusē pie bulciņu kioska "Sala" no Preses nama tuneļa man pretī iznāca lapsa. Paskatījās uz mani, apstājās, palaida mani garām. Es viņai pabraucu garām kādu divu vai trīs metru attālumā un viņa nemaz nenoraustījās. |
|
aborigens |
10:13p | "Šitie draņķīgi pārtulkotie krimiķi. Tu, cilvēks, pirms miega gribi palasīt zviedru kriminālromānu, kas pārtulkots latviski un piedevām reklāmiski izkunkstēts par ļoti labu. Un tu smagi aplauzies, jo ieraugi, cik drausmīgi nabadzīga, tizla un vienmuļa ir zviedru valoda, kurā nav ne sinonīmu, ne idiomu un vispār ir tikai Google translate repertuārs. Kā viņi sazinās tik noplicinātā valodā?! Tur visi runā ar sakostiem zobiem (nevis caur zobiem) kā Grēta, bet tas netraucē policistiem katrā lappusē pa pieci lāgi būt "draudzīgiem", jo zviedru valodā acīmredzot nepastāv vārds "laipns". Neviens tikpat kā nekad neiet, nesteidzas, neskrien, un aizmirsīsim par lavīšanos, tipināšanu, lāčošanu, šļūkšanu un citām novirzēm, jo visi tikai DODAS. Es dodos. Viņš dodas. Man jādodas. Aizdevās. Ne vien katrā lappusē - pat katrā rindkopā tik dodas un dodas. Piedevām bez mērķa - vienkārši dodas." / Brice, Piktais sentiments |
|
covid_19 |
9:26p | brekte kā VIDEOmāgslinieks skatījos pirmo reizi un izsledzu nu fui skatījos otro reizi bez skaņas nu krāsiņas, ekspressija, šis un tas viņam būtu jāatceras, ka mūziķeni nav beidzis, bet mēmajā kīno es pat liktu stafkās naudu, goda vārds moš kāds viņam nodos - nu es kā mākslas kritiķis tipa sūds uz kociņa, bet viedoklis ir .... un latviešu kino melnbaltais vai krāsu, bet mēmais variants ir neaparts lauks viss viņa tēls prasās būt uz mēmā kīno, ko viņš apzināti vai neapzināti bojā ar skaņas celiņu būtu reāls konkurents ēķim |
|
zazis |
6:52p | Rekādu es smuku bildīti atradu.  |
|
zazis |
6:38p | Laikam taisnība vien būs tai psihoterapeitei, kura man vienā ballītē, viegli iereibusi, stāstīja ka kanabiss ir nr1 psihozes izraisītājs jauniem cilvēkiem. Vēl viņa teica, ka viņas bērni nekad nelietos, to gan apkārtējie uztvēra ar vieglu smīnu. https://www.mcgill.ca/newsroom/chan Visdrīzāk pie vainas nebūs kaņepes kā tādas, bet ļoti lielais THC % tanīs, kurš pēdējās pāris desmitgadēs ir audzis 10 un vairāk reizes. |
|
covid_19 |
5:56p | ņem, ko gribi un nenožēlo maksādams rēķinu par to - bene gesserit aksioma tas drusku apgriezts budisms sanāk, jo šamie saka - negribi, jo viss ko gribi un nevari rada sāpes un ciešanas |
|
zazis |
5:34p | Daži fanboji man ļoti sāk atgādināt šo veco video. Bet_es_arī_gribu_AES |
|
zazis |
5:09p | Es zinu, ka nekas nemainīsies, bet man atkārās žoklis https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/arz |
|
gnidrologs |
4:00p | Nu jā, processed meats ir slikti tā pat kā jebkas "processed". Visveselīgākā pārtika ir jēla, paša sagatavota gaļa. Ja tiek cepta, tad lopa taukos, nevis augu eļļās vai tml indīgos surogātos. Novārīt droši vien visveselīgāk. |
|
zazis |
2:47p | Tas brīdis ir klāt, kad darbiņā vairs nevar saģērbties atbilstoši laikapstāklim. Pie aktīvas kustēšanās karsti, pārējā laikā salst. Vienbvārdsakot, nosalu, jo ciest nevaru svīst, kad esmu par biezi saģērbies.  |
|
zazis |
1:11p | Somija, lets go! Finland's updated dietary guidelines recommend significantly reducing the consumption of processed meats, such as cold cuts and sausages, to mitigate health risks like colon cancer. Instead, the guidelines emphasise the importance of a plant-based diet that includes 500 to 800 grams of fruits and vegetables daily. Meat companies Atria and Snellman responded cautiously, stating that consumer choice remains essential and that they have no immediate plans to change their products. They acknowledged that the recommendations might significantly impact public sector catering more than individual eating habits, with broader changes expected in the long term. |
| Wednesday, November 20th, 2024 | ||
|
teja |
10:42p | "Pāru Terapija" - heteronormatīvs sūds. bet lielāko īgnumu rada pat nevis tas, bet gan tas, ka kustību - lielāko no mākslām - izmanto tik ilustratīvi, un ilustrē ļoti aprobežoti atgremotas reālpsiholoģiskas lietas. horeogrāfiem vajadzētu zināt labāk, ne? mūzika un scenogrāfija bija ok. horeogrāfija un scenārijs - viduvējības kalngali. drosmes necik. Gada pārsteigums - Ģirts Krūmiņš dejo. Viņš man arī patika vislabāk no visiem uz skatuves. Viņš un Roberta Gailīte. |
|
gnidrologs |
9:07p | To protect and preserve DNA and its accompanying mechanisms are clearly built to prevent change, to stay the same at all cost. The DNA doesn't just sit naked in the nucleus. It's protected by histones, which split DNA into connected links, protect it from damage, and control its condensation. On a higher level, the DNA is divided into chromosomes, which once again have mechanisms to prevent DNA from corruption. The end sequences of chromosomes are called telomeres and they serve the purpose of a buffer zone, protecting the chromosome DNA from getting damaged at its edges. When the DNA starts to decondensate for the purpose of replication, the double helix is split into two and each of the strands starts being replicated by DNA polymerase. The polymerase does not just blindly create a complementary chain of DNA, it has a mechanism to control whether the correct nucleotides (smallest units of DNA) are present. If they aren't, the nucleotide is thrown out. And the show still isn't over. After replication ends there is yet another set of mechanisms that control whether the DNA has been correctly replicated and folded. Topoisomerases control and repair any distortions and loops in the DNA. Nucleotide and base excision repairs once again control and fix any damage. What I am illustrating here is that the whole mechanism is designed to combat change, which is the supposed driving force of the alleged biological evolution. Notwithstanding that most mutations are either outright damaging or neutral. What is even more ironic, however, is that the process of small, random mutations slowly changing the genome relies on DNA replication with its elaborate repair mechanisms to begin with. Without these mechanisms, every tenth or so nucleotide would be paired wrongly, therefore the information in the DNA would immediately degenerate and fall apart into nonsense. How did a completely random and uncontrolled chemical process build a sophisticated network of information based on a coding language (the genetic code with its specific nucleotides etc.) with a whole system designed to control and repair any deviations from the code (not unlike grammar in language or syntax in programming)? Nobody knows, but most biologists will swear up and down that they know it was created by random events. Don't ask them about the specifics though, or they may start to blush. Sex As a short addendum, I may add that on the macroscopic level, the division of species into two genders defies any Darwinian explanation and explicitly acts against any change in the species. In an asexual cell that simply creates clones of itself, any mutation will be preserved and passed on to future generations. When it comes to sexually reproducing organisms, there will always be alternative alleles inherited from one of the parents that can mitigate and essentially silence a damaged allele inherited from the other parent. Therefore any idea of new complex systems arising randomly (new organs and so on) by distinct parts unintentionally complementing each other is a thousandfold more unfeasible than in a simple asexual organism. Yet again, we see in sexuality a system that acts against change. It tries to preserve the species as it is. While some people may think, especially in the modern world, that sexuality is constructed to bring in "new DNA" this is blatantly false to anyone who possesses some understanding of biology. What it is constructed to do is to bring in the undamaged, original DNA. So yes, if you live in a small community that has an endemic disease in it, it's beneficial to bring in new blood. Not because the foreigner has some kind of a new "super" DNA, but because he carries the original, undamaged allele, whereas your tribe has, through devolution and damage, acquired a mutated one. I may also briefly mention that animals, humans included, prefer to mate with partners of the same stock, who are not their immediate family but also not too distant. Even in the forsaken land of the USA, most marriages are between people of the same race. The mythological idea of divine incest makes perfect sense from a genetical point of view if we accept that the first, pure humans possessed no diseases in their DNA. The God of gaps? The atheist front of biologists, headed by Dawkins, likes to bring up the idea that those who oppose the theory of biological evolution do so only by relying on gaps in knowledge. "We do not know how this could have arisen, therefore God did it." While there are certainly religious people who think like this, Dawkins does not realize the irony of his statements. The entire evolutionary biology is based on gaps. Dawkins and his followers essentially say this: "We do not know how this could have arisen, but since we are materialists, it must have been chance." He nor any other biologist in the world can construct a sequence of mutations and events that would lead to the creation of complex biological systems, some of which I have described above. Neither is there a fossil record showing slow changes over time. Species appear and disappear suddenly from the fossil record. Animals as we know them with their organs and Baupläne, appeared out of nowhere during the Cambrian explosion. And dare I mention the fact that sequencing of genomes has complicated the supposed evolutionary relationships between species? So much so that in current biology, there is talk of a web of life or a bush of life rather than a "tree of life". In biology, the C-value paradox designates the conundrum of there being no relationship between the genome size and the complexity of the organism. This is another direct contradiction to the Darwinian theory. The evolutionary expectation is that as the genome of the organism grows (how it could even grow is another mystery by the way), there is more and more space for random mutations. The larger the DNA, the bigger the chance for new random mutations to occur. Therefore you would expect more complex organisms to have way larger genomes that enabled the complex organs to arise by chance. Yet this is not what we see. There are simple single-celled organisms that have larger genomes than humans. Is this not in line with the ancient idea of divine forces acting upon and shaping matter as they see fit? Conclusion The idea of biological evolution does not hold up. Neither does the idea of the static creation, upheld by many Abrahamists. Really, the Aryan, pagan idea of there being various subtle forces and beings affecting matter throughout ages explains biological findings the best. I hope you have taken something from my tangent. |
|
dienasgramata |
8:31p | *** paskaties dzelzceļa sliedes koku aleja vecā slimnīca šeit tu piedzimi un tepat blakus tava tēva un vectēva noliktā karote nekur tev nav jābrauc ne uz kādām spānijām paliec tepat dzīvo un karo te dzīvo un karo te |
|
meness_berns |
4:34p | --- Noklausījos "Songs of a Lost World". Man vienmēr vislabāk no "Cure" ir patikušas garas, šķietami monotonas sešu un vairāk minūšu ilgas kompozīcijas ar bagātīgu un netriviālu instrumentālo aranžiju. Un attiecīgi vislabākie ir tie albumi, kur šādu skaņdarbu īpatsvars lielākais. Un attiecīgi jaunais albums man ļoti ļoti iet pie sirds. |
|
zazis |
3:51p | Tu esi tas, ko tu lasi. |