|
Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 11:00 am
Nopietni, ja uz zvaigznes uzlietu pietiekami daudz ūdens, vai tā nodzistu? Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 11:03 am jojo
problēma būtu sagādāt pietiekami daudz ūdens. Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 11:04 am divi_g
Domāju, ka jā, jo agri vai vēlu izdotos panākt temperatūras krišanos līdz tādai, kurā kodolreakcija vairs nenotiek, taču domāju, ka skaitli, cik daudz ūdens būtu vajadzīgs, ir ļooooooti grūti iedomāties... Uzraksti šeit: http://what-if.xkcd.com/Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 11:11 am watt
domāju ka nē, jo tas būtu tā pat kā dzēst ugunskuru ar benzīnu (precīzāk, ar gatavu benzīna un skābekļa maisījumu). Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 11:14 am sirdna
ā, tas ir ūdens sadalītos par ūdeņradi un skābekli, un zvaigznei to vien vajag? He, tad jau varbūt labāk dzēst zvaigznes ar benzīnu? Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 11:19 am martcore
uzreiz ar propānu iesaku Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 11:57 am barvins
Nevajag aizmirst, kas te ir galvenais mērķis, ja - ja gribi kļūt par pasaules valdnieku, tad vienalga, vai piedraudi ar saules nodzēšanu vai uzkurināšanu, abi varianti der. Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 11:19 am divi_g
Mhm, good point. Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 11:18 am rediiss
kaut kur dzirdēju, ka zvaignzes vislabāk dzēst, iemetot tajās dzelzs klucīti. bet tā kā ķīmija nav mana stiprā puse, tad es nemācēšu izskaidrot, kāpēc. Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 11:30 am eermaniitis: Bingo! p.s. kodolfizika
Fusion occurs when atoms are pushed together with such force that they 'fuse'. It takes energy to do this, which is supplied by the pressure of gravity inside a star. This causes Hydrogen (the lightest element) to fuse to Helium (the second lightest). A byproduct of this is more energy, which pushes against the gravity and creates light, heat, etc. Just as burning wood releases energy to create heat and light as well (but burning is a different process than fusion). The energy released by fusion is greater than the energy needed to create it. Fusion is one of the most efficient forms of energy release we know of.
Eventually, the Hydrogen runs out, and the energy to push against the gravity of the star weakens. The gravity pushes harder, and this more powerful energy is enough to begin fusing helium, which takes slightly more energy than Helium. The star gets a new lease on life.
Finally, after several cycles of this fusion of heavier and heavier elements, the star is left with only iron in the core. Iron is so heavy it takes more energy to fuse it than you liberate from the process. So the gravity takes over and the star collapses. The pressure waves 'bounce' off the core and cause the upper layers (which are not iron) to explode in a supernova. Depending on the mass of the star, it eventually ends up as a dwarf, neutron star or black hole.
So iron to a star is a lot like celery - it takes more energy to digest than you get from eating it. If you lived on nothing but celery, you'd eventually starve, no matter how much of it you consumed. Same thing with a star and iron. Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 11:43 am rediiss: Re: Bingo! p.s. kodolfizika
aha aha, kaut kas šitā apmēram arī bija - kad zvaigznē rodas dzelzs, tad skaiti, ka viss, čau. Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 11:31 am napalmeye
Dzelzs ir visstabilākais elements un gan tā saskaldīšanai, gan apvienošanai vajag papildus enerģiju. Metot zvaigznē dzelzi, masa, kas var reaģēt un dot papildu enerģiju, tiek atšķaidīta. Augstāka numura elementi rodas, ja pareizi atceros, tikai supernovās. Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 12:08 pm watt
Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 11:25 am dunduks
Sauli noteikti nē, bet citas varbūt jā. Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 11:44 am rediiss
kapēc tā? Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 12:26 pm dunduks
Water is made of hydrogen and oxygen, which is fuel for the Sun’s fusion. But more importantly, the extra mass also makes the Sun heavier. This crushes it together more tightly and makes fusion happen faster. This means it will burn more brightly and run through its fuel more quickly.
As you keep adding water, the Sun will go through a lot of wacky fusion phases. (During one phase, called a helium flash, the reaction rate is proportional to the 40th power of the temperature—which is probably the largest exponent I’ve ever seen in a physics equation!)
But one way or another, eventually the whole thing will collapse in on itself, blow off its outer layers, and become a black hole. This black hole will keep soaking up water, spraying off X-rays in the process, until finally the municipal water department notices what you’ve been doing and shuts off your service. Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 11:27 am bozena
Pie viena lūdzu aprēķināt, vai zvaigzni var nodzēst, pietiekami lielā apjomā tai uzčurājot (izmantojot analoģiju ar zināmo čurāšanu ugunskurā). Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 11:28 am divi_g
Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 11:52 am sirdna
Aha, šitas ir riktīgais! Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 11:50 am misame
Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 12:28 pm dunduks: Labs saits priekš šādiem kāpēcīšiem
Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 12:40 pm black_data
Ugunsdzēsēji te pat uz grēcīgās zemes ne visur gāž ūdeni, ibo pie noteiktas temperatūras šis maita sadalās ūdeņradī un skābeklī. Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 02:09 pm unpy
Jāsāk no otra gala - tā kā ir gana daudz nodzisušu zvaigžņu, tad varam pieņemt, ka tās ir nodzēstas tieši ar ūdeni, kālab gan ne. Wed, Mar. 6th, 2013, 02:24 pm starro
tikai tad, ja lietu naktī, kad nav tik karsts |