black_robin ([info]black_robin) rakstīja,
@ 2024-05-26 18:26:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
"How to account for this uncanny movement from mental image to spectral reality? To answer this we need to gain some historical distance—to relate the ambiguous metaphor of the phantasmagoria to the larger problem of ghost belief in post-Enlightenment Western culture. In particular we need to look at the powerful modern theme of demystification and the highly paradoxical arguments by which scientists and philosophers in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries attempted to do away with the old theological world of apparitions and gave voice to a new and explicitly psychological theory of supernatural phenomena. What we find, it seems to me, is that the demystifying project was peculiarly compromised from the start. The rationalists did not so much negate the traditional spirit world as displace it into the realm of psychology. Ghosts were not exorcized—only internalized and reinterpreted as hallucinatory thoughts. Yet this internalization of apparitions introduced a latent irrationalism into the realm of mental experience. If ghosts were thoughts, then thoughts themselves took on—at least notionally—the haunting reality of ghosts. The mind became subject to spectral presences. The epistemologically unstable, potentially fantastic metaphor of the phantasmagoria simply condensed the historical paradox: by relocating the world of ghosts in the closed space of the imagination, one ended up supernaturalizing the mind itself."


(Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)

kompliments
(Anonīms)
2024-05-26 22:54 (saite)
Arvien pārsteidz kādu s*** tu mēdz lasīt...

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Diskusija)

Re: kompliments
(Anonīms)
2024-05-26 22:57 (saite)
Ko tu gribi teikt ar šo komentu, anonu muļķi? Gribi pa muti? Beidz piep*sties meitenei.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

Re: kompliments
(Anonīms)
2024-05-27 00:55 (saite)
Nu nevajag uzreiz pa muti solīt, es taču cenzēju vārdu "sūds".

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)


[info]ctulhu
2024-05-27 00:40 (saite)
Nu nav jau tik traki, tas vienkārši nozīmē ka visādas vīzijas, halucinācijas un kā viņi saka spokainas domas ir aparatūras kļūdas, faktiski tas pats kas piemēram krāsaini plankumi uz CRT TV/ monitora ekrāna ja tam pieliek klāt magnētu. Tas nenozīmē ka tur kur pārraide bija uzņemta/ no kurienes translēta ir krāsaini plankumi, tas vienkārši nozīmē kļūdu datu atveidošanā, šajā gadījumā elektronu staru izliekšanās dēļ. Vēl vienkāršāks piemērs - pleķis uz fočenes nenozīmē ka tur kur fočēja bija spokains pleķis, tas nozīmē ka tinte uz fočenes uzpilēja.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Diskusija)

tetovētas smadzenes
(Anonīms)
2024-05-27 00:58 (saite)
Kas būs pirmais: galvas pārstādīšana "tradicionāli" vai sveša ķermeņa vadīšana caur neiralinku?

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)


[info]brookings
2024-05-27 08:19 (saite)
mental

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)


[info]ctulhu
2024-05-27 10:17 (saite)
ko mental?

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)


[info]brookings
2024-05-27 12:15 (saite)
The way you categorically dismiss paranormal experience as a technical glitch.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)


[info]ctulhu
2024-05-27 12:27 (saite)
This is an evidence. Nothing else.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)


[info]brookings
2024-05-27 13:36 (saite)
I had a cat that once woke me up at 3 in the morning by softly patting my cheek, something it had never done before and never did again. I looked at the cat, and it gestured (by moving its head) to the foot of the bed, where I saw a woman (ghostly, white). She looked at me for several seconds and then bent down and disappeared.

I have had several paranormal experiences in my life (including one as a result of being an unwitting participant in an occult ritual prepared by someone who knew what they were doing). I mention this one with the cat because I was woken up to see it. Were both I and the cat experiencing a technical glitch?

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)


[info]mindbound
2024-06-05 08:29 (saite)
"The cat was doing what cats sometimes do (waking up people for their own little cat reasons), you saw something that wasn't there as people sometimes do, you ascribed personal significance to an otherwise meaningless cat activity because it felt unusual and/or important to you" would be my take on this.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)


(Anonīms)
2024-05-27 01:32 (saite)
psihologu trūkums mūsdienās ir tāds, ka viņi tā arī tiešā valodā tev nepasaka: "cibā rakstīt neaizstāj bļe ārstēt galvu"

(Atbildēt uz šo)


Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?