Nu nav jau tik traki, tas vienkārši nozīmē ka visādas vīzijas, halucinācijas un kā viņi saka spokainas domas ir aparatūras kļūdas, faktiski tas pats kas piemēram krāsaini plankumi uz CRT TV/ monitora ekrāna ja tam pieliek klāt magnētu. Tas nenozīmē ka tur kur pārraide bija uzņemta/ no kurienes translēta ir krāsaini plankumi, tas vienkārši nozīmē kļūdu datu atveidošanā, šajā gadījumā elektronu staru izliekšanās dēļ. Vēl vienkāršāks piemērs - pleķis uz fočenes nenozīmē ka tur kur fočēja bija spokains pleķis, tas nozīmē ka tinte uz fočenes uzpilēja.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Kas būs pirmais: galvas pārstādīšana "tradicionāli" vai sveša ķermeņa vadīšana caur neiralinku?

(Reply to this) (Parent)

mental

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

ko mental?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

The way you categorically dismiss paranormal experience as a technical glitch.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

This is an evidence. Nothing else.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

I had a cat that once woke me up at 3 in the morning by softly patting my cheek, something it had never done before and never did again. I looked at the cat, and it gestured (by moving its head) to the foot of the bed, where I saw a woman (ghostly, white). She looked at me for several seconds and then bent down and disappeared.

I have had several paranormal experiences in my life (including one as a result of being an unwitting participant in an occult ritual prepared by someone who knew what they were doing). I mention this one with the cat because I was woken up to see it. Were both I and the cat experiencing a technical glitch?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

"The cat was doing what cats sometimes do (waking up people for their own little cat reasons), you saw something that wasn't there as people sometimes do, you ascribed personal significance to an otherwise meaningless cat activity because it felt unusual and/or important to you" would be my take on this.

(Reply to this) (Parent)