antiprojekcija ([info]antiprojekcija) rakstīja,
@ 2021-10-28 00:18:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
JBP ķermeņa valoda
[info]bauda, šis Tev, no kultu pētnieka perspektīvas! Goda vārds, nemeklēju, uzdūros pilnīgi nejauši, lasot par kultiem. :)

What speaking like Jordan Peterson probably feels like

"He spoke in the round. He absorbed every dewy-eyed question into his feedback loop. He made lingering and deep eye contact with every woman in the crowd. The inner ring seemed to think he was speaking to each of them individually, privately. (..) On the other hand, there are scads of people who can’t stand watching him or listening to him. They cringe through every breathless paragraph. His strangulated voice is like nails on a chalkboard. They feel claustrophobic at the long droning whine of performed intellectual brilliance."

"I confess: I adopted the Peterson-body while reading from my poetry and novels back in the 1990s, as a classical music vocalist, while teaching yoga or meditation, and while proselytizing for the two cults that I was in."

"Peterson has mastered the muscular ballet of inflated masculine intellectualism. He embodies the wish of otherwise liberal men who feel that speech is the only sanctioned public violence left to them.

He can be pipsqueaky but imperious. He can whine on stage and still be seen as commanding. He can express pain and fragility as an emperor of confidence. He can have his lobster and eat it too."

"Peterson’s body tells them it’s okay to strike out from an avoidant bubble of self-fascination. It says that you can be as wimpy and whiney as you really feel inside, and yet still dominate. His body tells them that their own endless internal monologue of grievance is noble, smart, productive, and should be monetized."


(Lasīt komentārus) - (Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)


[info]antiprojekcija
2021-10-28 12:17 (saite)
Tas jau arī ir tas īstais jautājums - vai tas tiešām ir of substance, vai tā patiesībā ir kaut kāda asociāciju spēle, ko mēs noturam par dziļumu, tāpēc, ka neorientējamies jautājumos, par ko iet runa, ar īsto mērķi iedvest kaut kādu domāšanas veidu, pasaules skatījumu, nevis piedāvāt konkrētu argumentu.

Man līdz šim ir gājis gluži kā tai meitenei Tavā video - cenšos klausīties, bet saprotu, ka nav kam pieķerties. Es parasti sagaidu vai nu kaut kādus jaunus faktus, vai vecus faktus jaunā gaismā, bet nu vienkāršā un saprotamā valodā. Šeit kaut kā tāda sajūta, ka klausies cik gribi, bet punchline vēl ir kaut kur tikai tuneļa galā.

Nu, un protams, mani tāpat kā slikts padara aizdomīgu tas, ka tajās dažās lietas, par kurām esmu interesējies ("kultūrmarksisms" un C-16), viņš runā pilnīgas aplamības un/vai sazvērestības.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)


(Anonīms)
2021-10-28 13:55 (saite)
Jordan Peterson is the stupid man's smart person.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)


(Anonīms)
2021-10-28 21:49 (saite)
Izlasīja kaut kādu elitistu vāceli un tagad baigi gudrais.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)


(Lasīt komentārus) -

Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?