Sviesta Ciba |

resort (

resort) rakstīja,
@ 2021-07-22 17:26:00

Vai stulbie ir gudro subsets?

(Lasīt komentārus) - (Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)

Re: Rant
(Anonīms)
2021-07-25 05:15 (saite)

Hey, this is irrelevant to the thread, but since you've disabled commenting for non-users at your ciba, here's what I'd like to say regarding your last post.
What exactly is your surprise of the amount of infected vaccinated ppl exceeding that of unvaccinated in a country where the overwhelming majority are vaccinated? What you should compare is the percentage of infected among vaccinated to percentage of infected among unvaccinated. If this number for the vaccinated would exceed that for the unvaccinated then yes, that is shocking news, but as it is, it's probably like 10 times lower (very ballpark guesstimate, too lazy to look it up). Maaan, it's like grade 3 math (or whenever they teach how to calculate percents).

Also, learn how to trim your links off the facebook tracing junk part) (https://dailysceptic.org/2021/07/17/infections-in-the-vaccinated-overtake-those-in-the-unvaccinated-for-the-first-time-but-the-graph-mysteriously-disappears-from-the-zoe-app-report/) ;)

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

	Re: Rant resort 2021-07-25 09:41 (saite)
	"Note that 68% of the population has had at least one vaccine dose" sapisies matemātikā ar to 10x div pret trīs ir tas pats order of magnitude. rupji varam pieņemt, ka lietas vaksos un parastajos ir 1:1 (Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

Re: Rant
(Anonīms)
2021-07-25 10:17 (saite)

Nu cik tad viņiem ir procentos saslimstība starp vakcinētajiem un nevakcinētajiem? Ja 68% ir vakcinēti, 32 nevakcinēti, un vakcinēto un nevakcinēto saslimstības absolūto skaitļu krustošanās brīdī tās ir 2 ar mazu astīti reizes. Man kkā likās, ka viņiem tur 80..90% savakcinējušies, lūk tad jau būtu tuvu tām 10 reizēm.
Bet ja tu paskatītos uz smagajiem saslimstības gadījumiem, vot tur čista būtu atšķirība par pāris orders of magnitude, ne tā?

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

	Re: Rant resort 2021-07-25 11:18 (saite)
	baumās balstīts personīgais viedoklis - potētiem mazāk smagi saslimušo nevis uz vieglākas formas rēķina, bet uz ar vakcīnu nesaistītas pāragras nāves rēķina (Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)

Re: Rant

brookings
2021-07-25 12:23 (saite)

I wasn't too lazy, and I can tell you it isn't 10x. The rate of positive tests among the vaccinated is currently about 65% of the unvaccinated. You can check my figures as I did on the back of a piece of paper.

Which isn't much (the difference), and ought to have us asking more questions about the risk-benefit ratio, which we would do if we lived in a normal society.

However, for me, the most interesting aspect is the direction of the rates. Among the unvaccinated, it is dropping naturally; however, among the vaccinated it is rising sharply.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)

(Lasīt komentārus) -

Navigate: