Sviesta Ciba |

Chloroform Sauna (

martcore) rakstīja,
@ 2012-11-12 12:56:00

par sho

es pats personiski paziistu divus cilveekus, kas straada narkologjijas sfeeraa, tie ir ljoti sakariigi un sapraatiigi cilveeki, kuru viedoklii par dazhaadaam ar mediciinu saistiitaam teemaam es, teiksim taa, nopietni ieklausos. tachu, kad runa aiziet par legalaizu, vinjos pamostas Aarsti Ar Hipokraata Zveerestu, kas uzskata, ka vislabaak buutu vispaar aizliegt visu nahuj, cigaretes, alu un viskiju, nu aptiekaa var paardot simts gramus viina, lai pareizi izceptu piili.

"bldzhad", saku, "es masu medijos to vien dzirdu, kaads gan drausmiigs posts ir narkotikas. bet in real life es no tevis dzirdu, ka tev 30-gadiigi cilveeki mirst uz rokaam no alkohola. 30-gadiigi! un par sho teemu vispaar neviens nerunaa, iznjemot tevi. tu tachu aardies, ka laukos ar stipro alu cilveeki atmet slidas, kameer no ar likumu aizliegtaas marihuaanas nekkadu liikju un nepatikshanu nav. un nevajag tikai iedomaaties, ka kaut kaads suuda likums attur cilveekus no lietoshanas vai izplatiishanas. attur apmeeram tikpat, kaa savulaik polshs taksista bagaazhniekaa. valsts vieniigaa probleema ir, ka taa no shii biznesa neieguust ne kapeiku, a pastaavees shis bizness taapat, vienalga, vai tas kaadam patiik vai nepatiik"

"aizliegt visu nahuj. nu bishkinj var", taada ir aarstu niilzirdziskaa nostaadne.

(Lasīt komentārus) - (Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)

	martcore 2012-11-12 15:18 (saite)
	domaaju, muusu valstii tas nav tik ljoti politisks jautaajums (un basnjaam par alkolobijiem es ne paaraak ticu), kaa tas, vai legalaiza idejai ir iespeejams kaut kaads kompetents atbalsts no pashiem aarstiem. dakteri ir pret, un uz vinju viedoklja arii balstaas visa shii bezjeedziiba. (Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

watt
2012-11-12 15:22 (saite)

dakteri vispaar no ekonomikas neko nejeedz, taapeec jau slimniicaas taads totaals bardaks. arii no cilveektiesiibaam viņi jēdz maz.
reku materiāliņš ar skarbiem skaitļiem: http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/11/legalising-marijuana

"In Mexico relatively few people take drugs. But many are murdered as a result of the export business. About 60,000 have been killed by organised crime during the past six years."

"IMCO [Mexican Institute for Competitiveness] [...] calculates that the cost of growing marijuana legally is about $880 per kilo. Adding on a decent mark-up, plus the taxes that would be applied, it puts the wholesale price of Washington marijuana at just over $2,000 per kilo. The cost of illegally transporting the drug adds about $500 per kilo for every thousand kilometres that the drug is hauled, it calculates, based on the fact that pot gets pricier the further you get from the Mexican border. So smuggling legal Washington dope to New York, for instance, would add about $1,900 to the cost of a kilo, giving a total wholesale price not much below $4,000.

That would make it more expensive than imported Mexican pot. But home-grown marijuana is much better quality than the Mexican sort. The content of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the part that gives you the giggles, is between 10% and 18%, whereas in Mexican pot it is only about 4% to 6%. Once you adjust for quality, Washington pot would be about half the price of the Mexican stuff, even after it had made its expensive illegal journey to New York. IMCO reckons that home-grown marijuana from Colorado, Oregon or Washington would be cheaper than the Mexican stuff virtually everywhere in the country, with the exception of a few border states where the Mexican variety would still come in a bit cheaper."

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

martcore
2012-11-12 15:42 (saite)

tas, ka vinji nejeedz neko ekonomikas, nu vinjiem laikam arii nekas nav jaajeedz no taa
es driizaak domaaju, kas vinjus attur atziit vieglo narkotiku priekshrociibas pret smago alko. man saak likties, ka attur tas, ka nebuus redzami nekaadi momentaanie rezultaati, cilveeki uzvestos tieshi taapat, kaa vinji uzvedaas; aarsti neredz sho investiiciju demograafijaa. jo latvijaa buus jaapaiet vismaz vienai paaudzei, lai kaut cik mainiitos cilveeku ieradumi.
vieniigais, ko ir iespeejams dariit - pacelt sho jautaajumu plashaakaa sabiedriibas apsprieshanaa, lai beidzot vareetu visi pateikt savus argumentus.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)

	watt 2012-11-12 15:24 (saite)
	un, ble, ja cilvēki ar krokodilu duras, zinot ka tūlīt arī nosprāgs, par kādu aizliegšanas politiku tur vispār runāt? http://www.kasjauns.lv/lv/zinas/99284/latvijas-narkomani-sapust-dzivi-lietojot-jauno-narkotiku--krokodilu-video (Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)

(Lasīt komentārus) -

Navigate: