Sviesta Ciba |

Siderius Nuncius (

mapet) rakstīja,
@ 2009-12-01 20:36:00

Mad and Wave.
az - any box is too small.
dienasgramata - you promised me poems by tricky.
elina - thank you for music you send me.
freakart - affair bija epic fail.
laboratorija - a person.
minddll - .
raracom - you should live with the stars.

(Lasīt komentārus) - (Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)

	mindbound 2009-12-02 09:22 (saite)
	Not yet. (Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

	az 2009-12-02 09:27 (saite)
	true. still one final question left. (Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

	mindbound 2009-12-02 10:00 (saite)
	Just one? Which one? (Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

	az 2009-12-02 14:38 (saite)
	why (Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

	mindbound 2009-12-02 16:54 (saite)
	Maybe there is no "why" at all. (Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

	az 2009-12-03 08:05 (saite)
	;] well, if one ultimate answer were granted, what would be ur question? (Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

	mindbound 2009-12-03 15:43 (saite)
	It would be "why", of course. I just suspect that the answer would be such - that there is no "why" applicable in this case at all. (Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

az
2009-12-03 20:01 (saite)

sure, that could be the case. but id really like to check whether existence has got something better to say. look, the science. basically its just wondering around, surprises and excitement. and usually there is one theory pro, and another against. and u can never be sure. and some things just ignore predictable, statistical order. well, all respects to Chaos, but i wouldnt trust it entirely.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

mindbound
2009-12-03 20:56 (saite)

Actually, science usually has stern and strict predictions about what is, and what is not. If you see a scientist loudly accepting that "the opposite of a profound truth is usually another profound truth", there is a profound chance that you are actually looking at a prophet of pseudoscience, not a scientist.

And chaos, in most of the cases, is actually quite predictable, only the methods of prediction are quite different from the usual ones.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

	az 2009-12-04 06:19 (saite)
	beautiful. the way those words are written. and i guess it is beautiful world to live in. still, there is always smething wrong, isnt there? the way world acts. the way humans still cannot control matter, no matter how much they seem to get to know about allthatis. (Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

	mindbound 2009-12-04 12:32 (saite)
	We are steadily advancing towards this. (Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

	az 2009-12-04 13:19 (saite)
	why? (Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

	mindbound 2009-12-04 14:15 (saite)
	The progress. The law of accelerating returns. (Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

	az 2009-12-04 14:33 (saite)
	gr8 ;]]] just do not loose ability to loose and laugh. in case progress has its own peculiar sense of humor. (Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)

(Lasīt komentārus) -

Navigate: