par zinātnisko konsensu
Sakarā ar šo sarunu gribās pajautāt citiem kā jūs skataties uz konsensu. Kurā brīdī konsenss tiešām ir valīds pamats kaut ko uzskatīt par patiesu un vai vispār zinātne tā strādā? Kā atceramies, tad arī globālā siltumarmagedona alārmisms ir dziļi konsensuāla lieta un operē ar fuzzy/unreliable/interpretējamu datu kopumu. Vai tā ir tāda progresīvisma mode - zinātne kā fashion statement?


Over 1,600 scientists have signed a letter condemning a proposal by the Trump administration to define gender as biological and established at birth.
[...]
"Though scientists are just beginning to understand the biological basis of gender identity, it is clear that many factors, known and unknown, mediate the complex links between identity, genes, and anatomy," the authors write in the letter, which links to 10 different scientific studies.

The letter goes on to explain that no scientific test can "unambiguously determine gender, or even sex".

"Even if such tests existed, it would be unconscionable to use the pretext of science to enact policies that overrule the lived experience of people's own gender identities."


>>> it's all so ambiguous
>>> lived experience > all