gnidrologs ([info]gnidrologs) rakstīja,
@ 2018-10-25 16:33:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
globālisti pret zaimošanu
The European Court of Human Rights ruled on Thursday that an Austrian woman’s criminal conviction and fine for her statements accusing the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) of pedophilia did not breach her right to free speech.

Stating that the court had found that “the applicant’s statements had been likely to arouse justified indignation in Muslims” and “amounted to a generalisation without factual basis”, the ECtHR statement said the woman’s comments could not be covered by the freedom of expression.

Saying it classified the ‘impugned’ statements as “an abusive attack on the Prophet (PBUH) of Islam, which was capable of stirring up prejudice and putting at risk religious peace,” domestic courts came to the conclusion that her speech contained elements of “incitement to religious intolerance.”


Protams, nekas tāds neattiecas uz kristietību un tās ikonām. Itz ebul whypipo religun.


(Lasīt komentārus) - (Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)


[info]methodrone
2018-10-26 18:49 (saite)
Es gribēju teikt, ka gan jau vēl paliek prāta brīvība, pat ja savā nodabā tik vien kā vai privātā kladītē. Bet tad es atcerējos, ka drīz mašīnas/AI ieurķēsies arī smadzenēs, un moška pat domas paliks nelegālas. Tā ka jā, what he said.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)


(Lasīt komentārus) -

Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?