Sviesta Ciba |

extranjero (

extranjero) rakstīja,
@ 2020-04-26 10:07:00

Es neuztveru nopietni PVO paziņojumus, ka nav pierādījumu par to, ka koronavīrusu pārslimojošiem rodas imunitāte. Protams, tas ir pētāms jautājums, cik ilga ir šī imunināte un kādā mērā. Tomēr PVO paziņojumi nav īpaši uzticami un ierindojami tajā pašā kategorijā kā “nav pierādījumu par vīrusa pārnešanu cilvēkam” vai “nav pierādījumu, ka masku lietošana ir vēlama”. Cik man zināms, neviens no šiem paziņojumiem nav oficiāli atsaukts.

Vēl ir uzpeldējusi interesanta nianse par politisko ietekmi uz PVO. Mugabe, Zimbabves bijušais diktators, kurš noveda savu valsti, ieskaitot tās veselības sistēmu līdz kliņķim, ka pats pēc tam brauca vienmēr ārstēties uz ārzemēm, bija iecelts par PVO labās gribas sūtni. To izdarīja pašreizējais PVO vadītājs, un tikai pēc liela starptautiska spiediena, viņš noņēma diktatoru no šī amata. Aizkulisēs runā, ka viņi bija draugi, un pašreizējais vadītājs bija apsolījis, ka piešķirs Mugabe šo godu.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/oct/22/robert-mugabe-removed-as-who-goodwill-ambassador-after-outcry

(Lasīt komentārus) - (Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)

	gnidrologs 2020-04-26 15:36 (saite)
	Tu vēl ar vien dod benefit of the doubt šim smirdīgajam kantorim? PVO ir tik pat korumpēts subhjūmanu kantori kā ANO, kur cilvēktiesību komitejās sēž agresīvākie to pārkāpēji no dvieļgalvu un āfrikas sūdbedrēm. (Atbildēt uz šo) (Diskusija)

extranjero
2020-04-26 17:04 (saite)

Nu jau ir ieslēguši atpakaļgaitu, kad parādījās šādi komentāri:

Staying on the immunity issue for a moment, the World Health Organisation statement caused such alarm because it was open to the interpretation that people who have recovered from the virus were not immune from reinfection. In fact, while the evidence is still being evaluated, most scientists believe quite the opposite.

Prof Paul Hunter, professor in medicine at the University of East Anglia, said everyone or almost everyone who recovers from Covid-19 “will have developed immunity otherwise they would not have recovered”. “What we do not know is how long that immunity will last. It almost certainly will not last for life,” he said.

Prof Babak Javid, the principal investigator at Tsinghua University School of Medicine in Beijing, said the WHO’s statement was “very confusing”.
Given that the majority of people that have had Covid-19 develop neutralising antibody responses, he said, it is “reasonable to assume that they will develop at least short-term immunity from re-infection – the critical questions are how robust that immunity would be, and for how long it would last.”

The WHO alarmed some in the scientific community when it said, in a briefing note published on Saturday, that “there is currently no evidence that people who have recovered from Covid-19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection”.

Experts said the WHO should have said there was “currently insufficient evidence” instead of “no evidence”.

Late last night, the Geneva-based body walked back its statement, saying: “We expect that most people who are infected with #COVID19 will develop an antibody response that will provide some level of protection.” See the WHO’s tweets below:

We expect that most people who are infected with #COVID19 will develop an antibody response that will provide some level of protection.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)

(Lasīt komentārus) -

Navigate: