philosophers fail
http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/65242-the-moral-complexities-of-eating-meat/

The book has its genesis in the New York Times's write-your-best-defense-of-meat-eating competition -- the editors were each finalists -- but all of the papers in the book are critical of contemporary meat production. Moreover, the number of essays defending the permissibility of eating meat is small: Belshaw's and Callicott's alone do.

Upd. Pēdējos gados par 'dzīvnieku ētiku' izdoto peer-reviewed grāmatu apjoms ir tāds, ka, lai noorientētos vien, paies vairāki mēneši. Vai vai tam, kas gribēs latviski kaut ko sakarīgu uzrakstīt (viņpus DzB bukletiņiem un flaieriem) un sadursies ar nepieciešamību latviski pateikt, piemēram, "non-human animal".