None of the Above ([info]artis) rakstīja,
@ 2018-11-27 22:23:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
"[T]he political realm is where Soros has made his most audacious wager. After the fall of the Berlin Wall, in 1989, he poured hundreds of millions of dollars into the former Soviet-bloc countries to promote civil society and liberal democracy. It was a one-man Marshall Plan for Eastern Europe, a private initiative without historical precedent. It was also a gamble that a part of the world that had mostly known tyranny would embrace ideas like government accountability and ethnic tolerance. In London in the 1950s, Soros was a student of the expatriated Austrian philosopher Karl Popper, who championed the notion of an “open society,” in which individual liberty, pluralism and free inquiry prevailed. Popper’s concept became Soros’s cause.

It is an embattled cause these days. Under Vladimir Putin, Russia has reverted to autocracy, and Poland and Hungary are moving in the same direction. With the rise of Donald Trump in the United States, where Soros is a major donor to Democratic candidates and progressive groups, and the growing strength of right-wing populist parties in Western Europe, Soros’s vision of liberal democracy is under threat in its longtime strongholds. Nationalism and tribalism are resurgent, barriers are being raised and borders reinforced and Soros is confronting the possibility that the goal to which he has devoted most of his wealth and the last chapter of his life will end in failure."

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/17/magazine/george-soros-democrat-open-society.html


(Lasīt komentārus) - (Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)


[info]krishjaanis2
2018-12-01 01:34 (saite)
Starp citu, lielisks citāts - skaidri parāda iemeslu, kāpēc tik daudz jūdu savulaik atbalstīja ekstrēmus liberālisma, kreisuma un sociālisma paveidus (vai metafiziskajā spektrā dažādus apšaubāmus universālismus, agnostismus, spinozismus, reizēm pat relatīvismus utt). Labi, tā ir viņu pagātne, lai jau - viss jeb jūdu ambivalentais statuss ir kardināli mainījies līdz ar jūdu valsts nodibināšanies un cietas zemes atgūšanu. Ja ir jūdu valsts un nācija, tad kāda atsevišķa jūida bīdīts pārnacionālisms ir gluži vienkārši neētisks (kam Ārente, starp citu, piekristu) vai outdated.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)


[info]gnidrologs
2018-12-01 12:48 (saite)
Bet tieši tas jau turpina notikt un tieši tāpēc t.s. "antisemītisms" nekur nepazūd, bet atkal pieaug un "tribe that shall not be named" tabu izplēnē. Tu nevari no vienas puses bazūnēt un bīdīt atvērtību, multikultu un ultraliberālismu, tikmēr divkosīgi rezervēt savam etnosteitam tiesības uz ultrakonservatīvismu, bruņoti apsargātiem robežmūriem un vardarbību pret nelegāliem ienācējiem, neizsaucot pret sevi naidu. Tā taču ir tik transparenta adženda, ka bail. Tiesa, gods kam gods, Soross, cik zinu ir persona non grata pat Izraēlā, jo pat tur centās izbīdīt kaut kādu atvērtību.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)


(Lasīt komentārus) -

Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?