silent wings ([info]sw) rakstīja,
@ 2008-03-18 04:06:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Tiem, kuri neguļ :)
Malaguena Salerosa, YouTube, 4 min of your time.

(Lasīt komentārus) - (Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)


[info]mindbound
2008-03-18 07:42 (saite)
Of course there is coincidence, i.e. cases where two or more events are happening in a certain particular sequences. I just do not believe it could and should be always equated to causality, yet this is digression already. Regarding conspiracy theories, I cannot stand and fight for the opinion they all are completely false, although the possible kernel of truth in most of them seems to be tiny, well-hid and usually so obscure it almost could not be reckognised as such.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)


[info]sw
2008-03-19 02:15 (saite)
Sounds reasonable. Conspiracy theories usually emerge when the small grain of truth involved has the potential to 'sell', be it news, fiction or stock market rises. It is planted, it grows and gets harvested.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)

(Lasīt komentārus) -

Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?