Snorke ([info]snorke) rakstīja,
@ 2023-05-04 11:51:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
atradu sitadu rakstu The role of protein in weight loss and maintenance

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275667598_The_role_of_protein_in_weight_loss_and_maintenance

iesaka uznemt 25-30g proteina 4x diienaa - problema jau ta, ka to var izdarit tikai ar galu/zivi vai proteina pulveriem (vai ari 300 g biezpiena/grieku jogurta)

bet saka, ka 0.8g/kg esot tads minimums svara zaudesanai, vienalga tas sanak tik daudz, ka bez vistas un pulvera neiztikt

bet ok, salasijos ari par low-carb svara zaudesanu un secinaju, ka esmu uz pareizaa celja !

Higher-protein diets that contain between 1.2 and 1.6 g protein/ kg/day and potentially include meal-specific
protein quantities of at least 25–30 g protein/meal provide improvements in appetite, body weight management, and/or
cardiometabolic risk factors compared with lower-protein diets (Table 2).

(Lasīt komentārus) - (Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)

Re: i told them
[info]jojo
2020-05-04 14:25 (saite)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5048552/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30968137

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-020-00607-6

"In conclusion, our study provides evidence that higher total protein intake is associated with higher all-cause mortality, primarily driven by a positive association between animal protein intake and CVD mortality. In contrast, higher plant protein intake is associated with lower all-cause and CVD mortality. Food source and level of protein may play a substantial role as we observed harmful associations of total and animal protein mainly in North American and European populations and beneficial associations of plant protein mainly in North American and Japanese populations. Further studies in other populations with different amounts and food sources of protein intakes or with different protein requirements are needed to improve global dietary recommendations and to define optimal ranges and sources of protein intake for different populations."

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

Re: i told them
[info]snorke
2020-05-04 14:40 (saite)
visiem siem petijumiem ir sadi minusi

1) kadi proteni un kaa pagatavoti -- makdonalda burgeri vai sauteta ekozivs, tam ir milziga nozime, tas isti nav apskatits

2) tas ir subjektiem, kas nav uz svara zaudesanas dietas

3) tie nesalidzina riskus/mirstibu no obesity un riskus/mirstibu no proteinu esanas

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)

Re: i told them
[info]artis
2020-05-04 14:44 (saite)
Nieki.


1) https://alexleaf.com/2019/05/12/why-protein-restriction-for-longevity-makes-no-sense/
2) https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/panorama/dietary-studies-mostly-699469.html
3) https://www.vox.com/2016/1/14/10760622/nutrition-science-complicated
4) https://www.salon.com/2019/07/27/nutrition-science-is-broken-this-new-egg-study-shows-why_partner/
5) https://reason.com/2018/09/06/most-nutrition-research-is-bunk/
6) https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/you-cant-trust-what-you-read-about-nutrition/
7) https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/second-opinion-nutrition-causal-1.4810474
8) https://thecounter.org/dietary-guidelines-nutrition-faulty-research-surveys/
9) https://kresserinstitute.com/the-fundamental-problem-with-most-nutrition-research/
10) https://scopeblog.stanford.edu/2019/01/28/any-way-you-slice-it-nutrition-studies-are-controversial/

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)

(Lasīt komentārus) -

Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?