Snorke ([info]snorke) rakstīja,
@ 2016-09-10 14:14:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
veel nespeju noticeet
veel nespeju noticeet - bet sajemu atbildi no JAPPL - Journal of Applied Ecology:

As you will see, the referees appreciate the effort you have put into the resubmission and remain positive about the value of the work although they have made a number of further suggestions for improvement. I have considered your paper in the light of the comments received and I would like to invite you to prepare a further revision.

Nu, principa, tas noziimee - pienemts - nuja, pec further revision, bet tas ir taadi sikumi, tas viss ir izdarams
(pavisam lielos trukumus vinji kauka nav pamanijusi vai nav atzinusi par parak svarigiem)

nuko, peec kaadiem 2-3 menesiem vares redzeet onlinee manu Defining ecologically relevant water quality targets for lakes in Central Europe


(Lasīt komentārus) - (Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)


[info]vacatio
2013-09-12 15:35 (saite)
Bet lasīt jau nebūs jēga, ja reiz lielas kļūdas.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Diskusija)


[info]snorke
2013-09-13 17:40 (saite)
nee, ne kluudas, nepilniibas, jebkuru darbu var kritizeet, ka ideaala pasaulee tam buutu jaabuut ideaalam !

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)


(Lasīt komentārus) -

Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?