gnidrologs ([info]gnidrologs) rakstīja,
@ 2020-01-02 13:48:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
USSR and Capitalists were all on the same side in WW2

They have always been two sides of the same coin. Communism has never actually opposed Capitalism, it has complemented it. It is the false choice. If you reject capitalist society, then you must be a communist, now off to the gulag comrade.

They complemented each other so well and firmly established the sequestration of economic, military, and social control into the hands of the government and connected elites - on both sides of the capitalist/communist coin. The only real chance for freedom we had was with fascism, which opposed the fundamentally materialist foundation of communism and capitalism and is the only fighting force that actually achieved significant gains for human, civil, and worker rights in the last century.

It's not jews specifically, they're just one force among a few at the top orchestrating things, but they all benefit from the lower/middle class fighting each other instead of them.

Communism and Capitalism are the same thing - the rich owning everything while the poor starve and die. When you look at communistic societies you do not see the public owning the means of production, you do not see everything communalized. Instead you see centralized groups and party members taking everything by force and doling it out to those they like and using resources as a form of control.

In capitalism, you do not see increasing profits and GDP benefiting the lives of the common man. Instead all assets, land, and property is increasingly gathered up into the hands of centralized groups, corporations, and party members through financial games, boom/bust cycles, and parasitical renting and usury, with the upper crust taking everything and doling some out to those they like, using the resources as a form of control.

If you want freedom, you need an economic/political system that gives the average person more power, not select individuals.


(Lasīt komentārus) - (Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)


[info]snauts
2020-01-02 14:33 (saite)
Protams, ka tas ir 'gotcha' jautājums, tanī pat laikā tas ir tiešs un viennozīmīgs, tur nav ko šifrēt.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)


[info]gnidrologs
2020-01-02 14:45 (saite)
Ja priekš tevis sieviete un 'average person' ir konfliktējoši apzīmējumi, tad man tas nav saprotams.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)


[info]snauts
2020-01-02 14:54 (saite)
Priekš manis? Es cenšos saprast kā TU vari savā galvā savietot "more power for average person" un "sievietēm nevajadzētu dot balsstiesības".

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)


[info]gnidrologs
2020-01-02 15:55 (saite)
Sievietes priekš sevis iebalso sliktākus apstākļus, nekā vīrieši priekš viņām rada. Cue feministiskās lielvalstis ar regulāriem gangreipiem un neirotiskāmn kaķu vecenēm.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)


(Lasīt komentārus) -

Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?