gnidrologs ([info]gnidrologs) rakstīja,
@ 2019-11-18 20:23:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
labs kopsavilkums par globālismu&wokeness
This is the BIG reason why corporate America has gone woke (plus 4 more)
[​IMG]
Why have the biggest and most profitable American corporations embraced leftist politics, as seen in their woke advertising and social justice activism? Hint: It’s not because they’ve become non-profits and taken up philanthropy.
Judging by the Ted Talks of woke American CEOs, by the woke corporate advertising, and by the public relations campaigns promoting corporate 'brand activism,' one might reasonably conclude that the most successful, for-profit corporate giants in America have gone out of the money-making business to become centers of leftist political propaganda. And it’s not only the most woke corporate behemoths that promote leftist political notions. Go to a startup crowdfunding portal and count how many times the word “democratizing” is used to describe the mission of the startups there, or how many startup investments are pitched with the supposedly progressive political outlook of the prospective investor in mind.

What one encounters – from the boardrooms to the storyboards and beyond – is a nauseating, woke-up blend of equal parts Communist Manifesto, social justice handbook, sanctimonious sermon and used car sales pitch.
Just why has corporate America gone woke (while not yet broke)? Below, I run-down some of the possible explanations for woke capitalism or corporate leftism – from five to one – with five being the least compelling and one being the most.
5. The bosses are woke themselves. CEOs and other corporate executives went to business schools that weren’t that far away from social science and humanities departments. Business professors became friends with humanities and social science professors, who are notoriously left-leaning. Their leftism rubbed off on the business professors, who then spread it to their students, who went on to run corporate America.
4. To pander to their clients. Corporate leftism pleases the corporate customers with the most disposable income, those between 25 and 54, who likely live on the east and west coasts. This demographic includes millennials, whose politics are notoriously left-leaning. Choosing these “coastal elites”over the deplorables in “flyover states” has been an easy decision. The deplorables have less money anyway and they can go to hell if they don’t like corporate wokeness.
3. Being woke is easier than actually paying workers. Corporate wokeness acts as a placebo, a substitute for economic concessions by corporations. The statements of woke CEOs, the woke ads, the woke activism – these cost a lot less than higher wages and better benefits for workers, or lower prices for customers. Plus, the dummies seem to fall for it every time.
2. To keep the government wolf from the door. Woke capitalism appeases the political elite, putting corporations in the good favor of liberal lawmakers, in the hopes of favorable treatment from the latter. As liberals, these political operatives are more likely to impose burdensome regulations or to initiate anti-trust legislation that would pose big problems. Why not tell them what they want to hear?
1. Wokeness is itself part of globalist capitalism. Leftist politics are perfectly compatible with and supportive of the agendas of global corporate giants. Global corporations and leftist activists want the very same things:


(Lasīt komentārus) - (Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)


[info]gnidrologs
2019-11-19 16:35 (saite)
"Nevajag kļūdīties. Korporācijās viss tiek darīts primāri peļņas dēļ, un sekundāri PR dēļ."

Tas ir nodrāzts truisms. Jā, parasti tā bija, bet pēdējos laikos empīrika rāda ko citu. Piemēram, Gillete nav atteikusies no savas woke kampaņošanas, lai gan tā viņiem nesusi milzīgus zaudējumus. Holivuda nepārtrauc štābeļiem ražot AAA budžeta woke dreku, lai neraugoties uz box office feiliem. Iespējams tas daļēji no tā, ka viņi cieši saistīti ar banku sistēmu un ir "too big to fail", tiek subsidēti no līdzīgi domājošu politiķu lobija, bet fakts paliek - peļņas maksimizācija vairs nav primārais mērķis.

" The bosses are woke themselves.
Nope, they would get the boot.
"

Tad tu neesi sekojis līdzi Zukerberga, Dorsija, Gūgles (neatceros kas viņiem tur bija) CEO, Wikipēdijas dibinātāja u.c. kompāniju vārdiem un darbiem.

"Being woke is easier than actually paying workers.
Non consequitur."

Kāpēc? Strādāt "par ideju" bija ļoti populārs psiholoģisks lozungs arī sovokā, kad ar labklājību bija ļoti švaki.

"Globālisms. Nevis komunisms.
Kopš kura laika globālisms ir marksisma mērķis?"

Nu vispār jau kopš klasiskā marksisma laikiem. Visas pasaules komunizācija un atavistisko nacionālo valstu iznīcināšana bija ļoti konkrēti definēts mērķis. Ne velti intervencijas un sarkano ideju eksports pāri robežām uz vis dažādākajām pasaules malām, kuru sekas redzamas vēl ar vien tajā pašā D-Amerikā, daudz kur Āzijā un sovoka spiegu darbs ideoloģisku apvērsumu veicināšanā Rietumos. Tie paši kreisie ideologi ASV bija cieši saistīti ar CCCP izlūkdienestiem.
Īsi sakot - tā ir ekspansīva, internacionāla ideoloģija.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

(Nodzēsts puksts)

[info]gnidrologs
2019-11-19 17:05 (saite)
Zukermans absolūti nav izņēmums. Pašreizējie socmēdiju big-corpi faktiski darbojas kā viena organizācija.
Un nevienu nepiš strādnieki/zemnieki. Globālisti ir mūsdienu "aristokrātu" klase un viņu ideoloģija ir self-serving (nav jau tā, ka tas ļoti atšķirtos no veco laiku Poļitbiroja).

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)


(Lasīt komentārus) -

Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?