gnidrologs ([info]gnidrologs) rakstīja,
@ 2019-03-08 06:47:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
swedlol
Not a single political-correct Swede accepted to bring Ali home with him

Published March 6, 2019 at 13.20
DOMESTIC. The Stockholm city people who were interviewed at the town stated that they thought it was very good with immigration and opened to receive immigrants in their homes. But when the interviewer presented "Ali" and asked the politically correct Swedes if they could receive him, everyone backed.

The fact that it is easy to be good with the money of others is well known, and also that many who claim to advocate third world immigration often avoid the consequences of politics in their everyday lives.

In a report from Samhällsnytt TV, Tommy Deogan tests how serious a number of Stockholmers really are in their own goodness. The people who are interviewed claim first to be positive that Sweden should receive so-called refugees.

-"We must take care of people," says one of the answers.

The interviewed persons also state that they themselves could imagine receiving immigrants in their homes.

But then suddenly the immigrant "Ali" appears and Deogan asks the Stockholmers if they are willing to receive him to their home at once. Then it immediately becomes completely different scenario.

- "Ah...I am sorry but ... so...uh... I think like, I..uh I live ... I rent second hand so I think it is ... therefore", for example, a woman stems.

- "Basically absolute, but not de facto here and now", explains a man.

The other interviewees also come up with various types of explanations to avoid having Ali come home to them.

Tommy Deogan then asks if it might be that you would like to say that you want to receive immigrants in their homes, although you really do not want it.

- "No no no, but I...ah.... think this is self-evident that you should, absolutely, but then ... not ... " says a blond woman with glasses.
viģiks


(Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)


[info]snark
2019-03-08 08:47 (saite)
Ļoti normāla reakcija. Cilvēki tur maksā gana lielus nodokļus, lai ar šādām situācijām viņu vietā nodarbotos valsts institūcijas.

Tā ka sižets ir ne tikai par imigrāciju (lai gan protams, protams, un zināma deva liekulības tur parādās), bet arī par to, kā, valstij sagrābjot aizvien vairāk sabiedriskās dzīves funkciju, tiek bojāta pilsoniskā sabiedrība.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Diskusija)

(Nodzēsts puksts)

[info]snark
2019-03-08 09:06 (saite)
Domas eksperimenta ietvaros var iedomāties scenāriju, kurā Ali prezentē pilsoņiem kādā night watchman garā pārvaldītā valstī. Pieņemu, ka tur atbildes būtu patiesākas.

Bet doublethink un liekulība ir novēroti pareizi.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)


[info]heda
2019-03-08 09:26 (saite)
Mediji jau arī centās, cik ilgi vien varēja iztēlot tēvaiņus par teju zīdainīšiem. Daži cenšas vēl joprojām - šis, piemēram, pirms trīs gadiem esot ieradies kā bērns - https://www.expressen.se/nyheter/shafiq-20-ar-insparrad-efter-att-ha-gjort-egen-sportdryck/

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)


[info]heda
2019-03-08 09:00 (saite)
Bet viņi taču saņem konkrētu jautājumu: "Vai Tu...?" Un ikdienas sarunās cilvēki nebūt neuzskata, ka arī valstij šajā konkrētajā situācijā tas būtu jādara, jo tie ir nevajadzīgi riski un izmaksas. Arī nodokļu nauda nav nauda, kas aug kokos.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)


[info]heda
2019-03-08 08:47 (saite)
Video teksti - gan sākumā pareizie, gan pēc tam atsakoties no pašu teiktā - ir tik ļoti zviedriski :) Tas laikam ir kā padomju cilvēkus intervēt, publiski visu pateiks centīsies pateikt pareizi...

(Atbildēt uz šo)


Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?