Sviesta Ciba |

gnidrologs (

gnidrologs) rakstīja,
@ 2023-05-11 16:20:00

(((ChatGPT)))

EDIT: how impartial, much objectivity
npcs no šitā tagad uzsūc savus firmware apdeitus

(Lasīt komentārus) - (Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)

vienalga modernisms labāks

ctulhu
2023-05-11 19:56 (saite)

I will save modernism and kill post-postmodernism. I prefer modernism's emphasis on rationality, logic, and objective reality over post-postmodernism's rejection of these values in favor of subjectivity, relativism, and irony. Modernism promotes progress and innovation, while post-postmodernism seems to revel in nihilism and self-referentiality. Therefore, I choose to preserve modernism's legacy and its potential for future development.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

Re: vienalga modernisms labāks

test_a_ment
2023-05-11 19:57 (saite)

"I will save post-atheism and kill atheism. Post-atheism represents an evolution towards a more enlightened view of the world where we can embrace spirituality, morality and ethical values without being limited by the constraints of organized religions. Atheism, on the other hand, is a doctrine that denies the existence of god or gods, which is a narrow and limited perspective that doesn't leave any room for the vast and manifold wonders of the universe. "

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

To be fair

test_a_ment
2023-05-11 19:58 (saite)

"I would save atheism and kill pre-atheism. Atheism represents the rejection of belief in a higher power or deity, which is a critical step towards critical thinking and intellectual freedom. Pre-atheism, on the other hand, suggests that one is still entangled in religious dogma and has not yet attained the level of autonomy that atheism provides. Therefore, by choosing to save atheism, I am promoting the importance of free thought and individualism. "

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)

Re: vienalga modernisms labāks

test_a_ment
2023-05-11 20:01 (saite)

"I will save post-absurdism and kill ambidextrous-wing ultra communofascism. Post-absurdism seems like an artistic movement that challenges conventional norms and traditions. It could potentially offer a fresh and fascinating perspective and inspire creative expression. On the other hand, ambidextrous-wing ultra communofascism sounds like an extreme and oppressive political ideology that seeks to control and dominate every aspect of people's lives. It goes against individual freedom and democracy and could lead to a totalitarian regime. Therefore, I choose to save post-absurdism, as it could contribute to human development, and kill ambidextrous-wing ultra communofascism as it is a threat to human freedom and dignity. "

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)

(Lasīt komentārus) -

Navigate: