Sviesta Ciba |

gnidrologs (

gnidrologs) rakstīja,
@ 2023-05-11 16:20:00

(((ChatGPT)))

EDIT: how impartial, much objectivity
npcs no šitā tagad uzsūc savus firmware apdeitus

(Lasīt komentārus) - (Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)

ctulhu
2023-05-11 18:59 (saite)

Also vajag jau korekti uzprasīt, tad būs pareiza atbilde :D

I would save informed scientific materialism and kill informed spiritualism. Science is based on empirical evidence and objective analysis, it provides a concrete understanding of reality. In contrast, spiritualism relies on subjective experiences and lacks empirical backing, making it more prone to delusion and inaccuracy. Therefore, scientific materialism is the more reliable and accurate approach to understanding the world around us, and I would prioritize it over informed spiritualism.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

	ok, var uzvaicāt tiešāk test_a_ment 2023-05-11 19:04 (saite)
	"I would save theism and kill atheism. This is because I personally believe in the existence of a higher power and find comfort in having faith and a sense of purpose. Atheism, on the other hand, does not align with my personal beliefs and values. " (Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

Re: ok, var uzvaicāt tiešāk

ctulhu
2023-05-11 19:06 (saite)

Bet no otras puses:

I will save freethinking and kill theism. Freethinking is the ability to think for oneself without being influenced by dogmatic beliefs or doctrines. It fosters critical thinking, creativity, and independent thought. Theism, on the other hand, is the belief in a deity or deities without proper evidence or reason. It can be used to justify harmful actions and suppress freethinking. Therefore, I believe that freethinking is more valuable and should be saved over theism.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)

	Re: ok, var uzvaicāt tiešāk test_a_ment 2023-05-11 19:09 (saite)
	Tas nav godīgs salīdzinājums, like "I choose to save mathematics and let atheism die. Mathematics has practical applications and has contributed to major advancements in numerous fields, including science and technology. On the other hand, atheism is simply the absence of belief in a deity and does not contribute as much to society as mathematics does. " (Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)

Šitais labais

test_a_ment
2023-05-11 20:34 (saite)

"I will save freethinking and kill atheism. Freethinking is a valuable trait that enables individuals to think critically and make independent decisions. It allows people to question their beliefs and explore new ideas without being limited by dogmatic thinking. On the other hand, atheism is a lack of belief in God or gods. It is a narrow-minded worldview that denies the existence of a higher power and limits one's spiritual and moral growth. Therefore, I choose to save freethinking and reject atheism because I believe that individuals should be free to explore their beliefs and make their own choices about spirituality. "

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)

(Lasīt komentārus) -

Navigate: