None of the Above ([info]artis) rakstīja,
@ 2018-01-20 14:09:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
"According to Smith, the most pressing dangers came not from the state acting alone, but the state when captured by merchant elites. [B]eing granted militarily-backed private monopolies was far easier than having to compete on the open market by lowering prices and improving quality. The merchants in this manner constantly conspired to capture the state, defrauding the public by using political power to promote their own sectional advantage. [..] Under absolutely no circumstances, Smith thought, should merchants be put in charge of politics. Their monopolistic conspiracies would be ‘destructive’ to all countries ‘which have the misfortune to fall under their government’. [..] The true ‘science of a statesman or legislator’ consisted in deciding how best to govern the merchants’ nefarious activities. Effective politicians had to strike a balance between granting economic elites the liberty to pursue legitimate commercial activities, while also applying control when such activities became vehicles for exploitation."

https://aeon.co/essays/we-should-look-closely-at-what-adam-smith-actually-believed


(Lasīt komentārus) - (Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)


[info]krishjaanis2
2018-01-20 18:09 (saite)
bet kas tiešām ir gudri, ir novērojums (par ko jau kādu laiku domāju), ka starp British East India Company (alas, šodien Goldman Sachs, Google etc) un kādu sociālistiskas vai pat PSRS stila valsts lieluzņēmumu sevišķi lielas atšķirības nav. Google ir pat tuvāk real socialism, jo atšķirībā no East India kompānijas, ir atkratījusies no kādas noteiktas, konkrētas valsts patronāžas/aizbildniecības un sevi universalizējusi pa visu pasauli.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)


[info]krishjaanis2
2018-01-20 18:16 (saite)
ā, un vel pēdējais - no ekonomikas/politikas morāles (es teiktu - no Karla Šmita) skatpunkta nav atšķirība, vai state capture notiek caur merčantiem vai caur kādu apspiestu/priviliģētu šķiru vai tās intereses šķietami pārstāvošu avangarda/establišmenta partiju.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)


(Lasīt komentārus) -

Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?