zamza (![[info]](http://klab.lv/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} arc) rakstīja,@ 2011-04-29 15:17:00 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
nedaudz tankā un ar novēlošanos (par Islandi)
http://netrightdaily.com/2011/04/icelan
UN
mana islandiešu drauga komentārs čatā par šo tēmu (viņš ir viens no 40%, kas balsoja referendumā par likuma saglabāšanu spēkā):
Helgi: yes, I voted yes in the election
Helgi: the foreign press has somewhat simplified this issue. turned it upside down
Helgi: Law number 13/2011 allows for the Minister of Finance to to confirm the contract which was inscribed in London on the 8th December 2010, on responsibility for the Depositor and Investors’ Protection Fund to re-pay the British and Dutch states for ___the cost of the minimum insurance amount___ to depositors in branches of Landsbanki Islands hf. in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands and the payment of the balance and interest on those obligations.
The law was passed by Althingi on the 16th February 2011 but the President of Iceland declined to pass it. Should law number 13/2011 remain in force? Possible answers are: Yes, it should remain in force. No, it should be repealed.[4]
this was the question
me: ay, it was about the repayment of the state guaranteed deposit minimum, not all the money?
Helgi: yes
every western country has said that Iceland should help the british and the dutch governments to pay depositors back a minimum amount, all according to the European Economic Area Agreement, which Iceland is a member of
so eventually Iceland made an agreement with those nations, with very good interest rates
now, Landsbanki is bankrupt
but it has huge assets
still
and those assets will cover the payments up to 95 percent
I said yes because it was a very reasonable way of dealing us out this mess
but, Icelanders said no - 60 % said no
lots of people didnt understand the elections
they simply believed that it meant pay or not pay
but now formally Iceland has rejected any negotiaons in the dispute
so UK and Holland are preparing a international court action against the Icelandic state
which Iceland will surely lose
and probably end up with paying lots more
and meanwhile the states capacity on the international loan markets has been damaged
http://netrightdaily.com/2011/04/icelan
UN
mana islandiešu drauga komentārs čatā par šo tēmu (viņš ir viens no 40%, kas balsoja referendumā par likuma saglabāšanu spēkā):
Helgi: yes, I voted yes in the election
Helgi: the foreign press has somewhat simplified this issue. turned it upside down
Helgi: Law number 13/2011 allows for the Minister of Finance to to confirm the contract which was inscribed in London on the 8th December 2010, on responsibility for the Depositor and Investors’ Protection Fund to re-pay the British and Dutch states for ___the cost of the minimum insurance amount___ to depositors in branches of Landsbanki Islands hf. in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands and the payment of the balance and interest on those obligations.
The law was passed by Althingi on the 16th February 2011 but the President of Iceland declined to pass it. Should law number 13/2011 remain in force? Possible answers are: Yes, it should remain in force. No, it should be repealed.[4]
this was the question
me: ay, it was about the repayment of the state guaranteed deposit minimum, not all the money?
Helgi: yes
every western country has said that Iceland should help the british and the dutch governments to pay depositors back a minimum amount, all according to the European Economic Area Agreement, which Iceland is a member of
so eventually Iceland made an agreement with those nations, with very good interest rates
now, Landsbanki is bankrupt
but it has huge assets
still
and those assets will cover the payments up to 95 percent
I said yes because it was a very reasonable way of dealing us out this mess
but, Icelanders said no - 60 % said no
lots of people didnt understand the elections
they simply believed that it meant pay or not pay
but now formally Iceland has rejected any negotiaons in the dispute
so UK and Holland are preparing a international court action against the Icelandic state
which Iceland will surely lose
and probably end up with paying lots more
and meanwhile the states capacity on the international loan markets has been damaged
