None of the Above ([info]artis) rakstīja,
@ 2018-03-04 13:40:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Abstract: "Analysis of the mid-Victorian period in the U.K. reveals that life expectancy at age 5 was as good or better than exists today, and the incidence of degenerative disease was 10% of ours. Their levels of physical activity and hence calorific intakes were approximately twice ours. They had relatively little access to alcohol and tobacco; and due to their correspondingly high intake of fruits, whole grains, oily fish and vegetables, they consumed levels of micro- and phytonutrients at approximately ten times the levels considered normal today. This paper relates the nutritional status of the mid-Victorians to their freedom from degenerative disease; and extrapolates recommendations for the cost-effective improvement of public health today."

"It shows that medical advances allied to the pharmaceutical industry’s output have done little more than change the manner of our dying. The Victorians died rapidly of infection and/or trauma, whereas we die slowly of degenerative disease. It reveals that with the exception of family planning, the vast edifice of twentieth century healthcare has not enabled us to live longer but has in the main merely supplied methods of suppressing the symptoms of degenerative diseases which have emerged due to our failure to maintain mid-Victorian nutritional standards [38]. Above all, it refutes the Panglossian optimism of the contemporary anti-ageing movement whose protagonists use 1900 – a nadir in health and life expectancy trends - as their starting point to promote the idea of endlessly increasing life span. These are the equivalent of the get-rich-quick share pushers who insisted, during the dot.com boom, that we had at last escaped the constraints of normal economics. Some believed their own message of eternal growth; others used it to sell junk bonds they knew were worthless."

"The mid-Victorian gene pool was not significantly different to our own, yet their incidence of degenerative disease was approximately 90% less [24]. In the high-nutrient mid-Victorian environment, the vast majority of the population was protected; and the combination of high levels of physical activity and an excellent diet enhanced the expression of a coordinated array of health-promoting genes."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2672390/


(Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)


[info]gnidrologs
2018-03-04 17:16 (saite)
"It shows that medical advances allied to the pharmaceutical industry’s output have done little more than change the manner of our dying."

Common sense visiem, kas nav 'progresīvisma' kultā.

(Atbildēt uz šo)


[info]gedymin
2018-03-04 23:47 (saite)
Šokējoši rezultāti... ja būtu patiesi, bet tā neizskatās. Pirmkārt, a priori varbūtība uzticēties tiem ir maza - tas ir tikai viens pētījums, kas nav plaši citēts, par spīt clickbait'y tēmai. Papētot kritiku, izskatās, ka viņi nav ņēmuši vērā sievietes. Un pat ja būtu, rezultāti nesakrīt ar šiem datiem https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy (no http://www.mortality.org/), kuros pēc grafika 1850 gadā 5 gadu vecumā varēja gaidīt vēl 50 gadus, tagad vēl 75. Tātad par 50% vairāk. Plus, QALY aspekts vispār nav skarts.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Diskusija)


[info]artis
2018-03-05 10:23 (saite)
Man gan šķiet, ka sievietes ir ņēmtas vērā. Par citējamību piekritīšu.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)


[info]krishjaanis2
2018-03-06 00:48 (saite)
Beidzot kaut kas uz zinātnes, nevis ideoloģijas vai metafiziska bazāra pusi.

(Atbildēt uz šo)


Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?