pajautā! -

a kur ir teikts, ka Darvins bijis ateists?

Darvina brālis bija fašists

In The Origin Darwin talks much about pigeons, dogs, beetles, and other forms of life but says nothing of man.

Darwin was not an atheist. He described himself as an agnostic, and it is likely that he retained a belief in some kind of personal God, although not a diety who, like some master puppeteer, took a direct and continuously intervening role in the evolutionary process and in human affairs. Throughout his life Darwin maintained a sense of deep humility and a concern for his fellow man, fully aware of the limits of science. Darwin was deeply affected by the death of his older brother Erasmus ("Ras") in August 1881, and it is conjectured that his grief may have exacerbated the seriousness of his own poor health. In early 1882 he had several minor heart attacks. His condition worsened and on April 19, 1882, at 73 years of age, he died at Down House, after several hours of nausea, intense vomiting and retching, symptoms of a chronic illness that bedeviled him for the last 40 years of his life. At his bedside, and attending to his needs, were his wife Emma, his daughter Henrietta and his son Francis. A widespread rumor circulated -- facilitated by an evangelist by the name of Lady Hope who preached in Downe during the last years of Darwins life -- that on his deathbed Darwin renounced evolution and declared himself a Christian. This story, totally contradictory to the nature of the man himself, is a falsehood, denied by his daughter Henrietta and those who knew him best and who were actually at his bedside during his last weeks. Darwin's last words, spoken to his wife Emma, were in actuality, "I am not in the least afraid to die."

several hours of nausea, intense vomiting and retching?

no zinātniskas teorijas nevar atteikties

... un nevar vienārši atteikties, var tikai pārliecinoši apgāzt ar eksperimentiem un faktiem

flitta? Drīkst tev ko pajautāt? Vai tu esi personīgi ieinteresēta, lai Darvina teorija būtu nepatiesa? Pieod, ja kļūdos, bet pēc intonācijas var noprast, ka tā.
Protams, mana muldēšana nkādā veidā tev nedod atbildi uz tavu jautājumu, tomēr es uzskatu, ka nav neviena īsta argumenta, kas noliegtu darvinismu. Tas, ka Darvis savu teoriju noliedzis, ir iespējams, jo viņam bija jāpacieš konservatīvās sabiedrības un fanātiskāko kristiešu nosodījums.
Bet es jau neko... es jau neko...

ikviens turpmāks arheoloģisks izrakums runāja pretim darvina teorijai un tās aizstāvjiem nācās vislaik to pielabot. mūsdienās par to vairs nerunā kā par nopietnu teoriju, bet vienīgi kā par principu - "sugu evolūcija" ir zinātniski pierādīts fakts, kas cita starpā nekādi nerunā pretī idejai par pasaules radīšanu Dieva gribas rezultātā

Nē, nu, viss skaidrs. Viens no argumentiem pret Darvina teoriju varētu būt cilvēks. Cilvēka pārākums pār pērtiķi ir pārāk izteikts, lai varētu apgalvot, ka tiem ir kopīgs sencis. Cilvēkam ar viņa neizmērojamajām prāta spējām nevar būt tāda izcelsme. Esmu stulbs, bet padomāšu vēl vairāk.