pajautaa

« previous entry | next entry »
Maijs. 28., 2011 | 12:58 am
posted by: nebukadnecars in pajautaa

eu, ka kas notiktu, ja mēs SVF neatdotu to aizņēmumu? Nu, ko viņi var mums reāli izdarīt?

# | jā, ir doma! | Add to Memories


Comments {9}

from: [info]adelise
date: Maijs. 28., 2011 - 01:26 am
#

sados pi*di!

Atbildēt


Manas dzīves atskaņu almanahs

from: [info]ulvs
date: Maijs. 28., 2011 - 02:24 am
#

man liekas, ka īsti neko viņi nevar izdarīt. tās visas tomēr ir starptautiskās formalitātes, un to ietvaros civilizētajā pasaulē naudas dēļ cits citu nesit nost. ja nemaldos, praksē arī ir bijusi tāda situācija, kad kāda valsts neatdod fondam naudu, un viņi tur neko nevar padarīt. bļin, baigā sajūta, ka tā bija Islande.

Atbildēt | Diskusija


Skabičevskis

from: [info]begemots
date: Maijs. 28., 2011 - 09:41 am
#

Argentīna:

Argentina defaulted on part of its external debt at the beginning of 2002. Foreign investment fled the country, and capital flow towards Argentina ceased almost completely. The currency exchange rate (formerly a fixed 1-to-1 parity between the Argentine peso and the U.S. dollar) was floated, and the peso devalued quickly, producing higher-than-average inflation.
Large-scale debt restructuring was needed urgently, since the debt had become unpayable. However, the Argentine government met severe challenges trying to refinance its debt. Creditors (many of them private citizens in Spain, Italy, Germany, Japan and other countries, who had invested their savings and retirement pensions in debt bonds) denounced the default; the Italian government lobbied against Argentina in international forums. Vulture funds who had acquired sovereign bonds during the critical moments, at very low prices, asked to be repaid immediately.
The state had no spare money at the time, and the Central Bank's foreign currency reserves were almost depleted. (Moreover, whatever amount left was needed to control the availability of dollars in the local market, in order to prevent further devaluation of the peso.) For four years, Argentina was a pariah, effectively shut out of the international financial markets.
Even as the economic situation improved, the amount of the debt was still the largest defaulted debt in history (about 93,000 million USD), and Argentina was in no position to pay without sacrificing essential parts of its budget.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentine_debt_restructuring

Atbildēt | Iepriekšējais


Skabičevskis

from: [info]begemots
date: Maijs. 28., 2011 - 09:43 am
#

SVF iespējams neko arī neizdarītu, bet principā mums apstātos viss imports.

Kas diemžēl nav tikai D&G šmotkas un Leksusi, bet arī tādas lietas kā zāles, instrumenti, datori, utt.

Atbildēt | Iepriekšējais | Diskusija


murks

from: [info]murks
date: Maijs. 28., 2011 - 11:11 am
#

Un ne tikai zāles un datori, bet arī enerģija - degviela, elektrība, gāze.

Labi, gāzes jautājumu varētu nedaudz attālināt, ieņemot Inčukalnu, bet elektrību maisā nepaglabāsi, un degvielas rezerves ir simboliskas.

Atbildēt | Iepriekšējais


aardark

from: [info]aardark
date: Maijs. 28., 2011 - 02:40 am
#

Neko īpašu. Vienkārši tas nozīmē, ka valsts ir maksātnespējīga, strauji krītas kredītreitings, strauji ceļas procentu likmes, apstājas investīcijas, un vairs nekāda attīstība nav iespējama. Ja vien tā vietā nepalūdz naudu Krievijai apmaiņā pret de facto neatkarības zaudēšanu (skatīt Baltkrieviju).

Atbildēt | Diskusija


Karstā latviete

from: [info]implozija
date: Maijs. 28., 2011 - 02:47 am
#

+

Atbildēt | Iepriekšējais


kramers

from: [info]kramers
date: Maijs. 28., 2011 - 07:12 am
#

It kā mēs tagad būtu neatkarīgi ;)

Atbildēt | Iepriekšējais | Diskusija


starsailor

from: [info]starsailor
date: Maijs. 28., 2011 - 08:19 am
#

vai ne...

Atbildēt | Iepriekšējais