« previous entry | next entry »
Maijs. 28., 2011 | 12:58 am
posted by: nebukadnecars in pajautaa
eu, ka kas notiktu, ja mēs SVF neatdotu to aizņēmumu? Nu, ko viņi var mums reāli izdarīt?
from: ulvs
date: Maijs. 28., 2011 - 02:24 am
#
Atbildēt | Diskusija
from: begemots
date: Maijs. 28., 2011 - 09:41 am
#
Argentina defaulted on part of its external debt at the beginning of 2002. Foreign investment fled the country, and capital flow towards Argentina ceased almost completely. The currency exchange rate (formerly a fixed 1-to-1 parity between the Argentine peso and the U.S. dollar) was floated, and the peso devalued quickly, producing higher-than-average inflation.
Large-scale debt restructuring was needed urgently, since the debt had become unpayable. However, the Argentine government met severe challenges trying to refinance its debt. Creditors (many of them private citizens in Spain, Italy, Germany, Japan and other countries, who had invested their savings and retirement pensions in debt bonds) denounced the default; the Italian government lobbied against Argentina in international forums. Vulture funds who had acquired sovereign bonds during the critical moments, at very low prices, asked to be repaid immediately.
The state had no spare money at the time, and the Central Bank's foreign currency reserves were almost depleted. (Moreover, whatever amount left was needed to control the availability of dollars in the local market, in order to prevent further devaluation of the peso.) For four years, Argentina was a pariah, effectively shut out of the international financial markets.
Even as the economic situation improved, the amount of the debt was still the largest defaulted debt in history (about 93,000 million USD), and Argentina was in no position to pay without sacrificing essential parts of its budget.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentine_
Atbildēt | Iepriekšējais
from: begemots
date: Maijs. 28., 2011 - 09:43 am
#
Kas diemžēl nav tikai D&G šmotkas un Leksusi, bet arī tādas lietas kā zāles, instrumenti, datori, utt.
Atbildēt | Iepriekšējais | Diskusija
from: murks
date: Maijs. 28., 2011 - 11:11 am
#
Labi, gāzes jautājumu varētu nedaudz attālināt, ieņemot Inčukalnu, bet elektrību maisā nepaglabāsi, un degvielas rezerves ir simboliskas.
Atbildēt | Iepriekšējais