tavs koments par galvu laikam bija man domāts, tāpēc paskaidrošu. protams, to jau tikai ārsts zina, kas tev notiek mugurā, un apsolos vairs nepiesaukt psihosomatiku attiecībā uz tevi! bet piekritīsi, ka tas vienkārši ir interesants temats. te citāts no pavecas grāmatas, ko toreiz lasīju; es tikai gribēju padalīties, lai noslēgtu tēmu. muguras sāpes 90% gadījumā ir psihosomatiskas - bet atliek jau vēl tie 10%, un ja tajos iekļūst, tad jāklausa dakteriem uz vārda :(

===

Between 1976 and 1980 two Israeli physicians, Dr. A. Magora
and Dr. A. Schwartz, published four medical articles in the
Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine in which they
reported the results of studies they had done to determine whether
certain spinal abnormalities caused back pain. Their method was
to compare the X rays of people with and without a history of back
pain. If people with back pain had these abnormalities more
commonly, one could presume that the abnormalities might be the
cause of the pain.
They found no statistical difference in the incidence of
degenerative osteoarthritis, transitional vertebra, spina bifida occulta
and spondylolysis between the two groups. There was a small
statistical difference for spondylolisthesis. In other words, one could
not attribute back pain to these disorders, with the possible exception
of spondylolisthesis.
A similar study was conducted by an American radiologist Dr.
C. A. Splithoff and published in the Journal of the American
Medical Association in 1953. He compared the incidence of nine
different abnormalities of the end of the spine in people with and
without back pain. Again he found no statistical difference.
These studies suggest that structural abnormalities of the spine
do not generally cause back pain.