Snorke ([info]snorke) rakstīja,
@ 2023-03-06 19:46:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
par zinatni:

sodien laimes diena - Dievs atsutija salaboto rakstu (nu istenibaa pusi raksta, jo otru pusi es (un mazliet divains ungars) veel cepam)

un piemetinaja IT IS A GOOD START

Es: Adoption of ecologically based nutrient targets should result in higher probability of reaching good ecological status regarding eutrophication and river benthic flora communities.

Izlabots: Adoption of ecologically-based nutrient targets should result in better outcomes when managing rivers where nutrients are the major pressure preventing achievement of good ecological status

Es: Although being an important prerequisite, the ecological assessment provides only a first step towards reaching good status,

Izlabots: However, although ecological assessment is an important prerequisite, it is only a first step towards reaching good status,

nu tas pats, bet labaak

Water Research atsutija mesidzu (jau OTRO REIZI) ka minimum number of reviews ir, lai gaida ZINJU - bet pasu zinju nesuuta

es LOTI gribu pabeigt sito rakstu 2 nedeljaas (lai kertos pie nakamajiem rakstiem, kas mani kaardina vairaak, nu, vismaz pagaidaam) ziniet cik man jau ir references - 75 (septindesmitpiecas)

bet jo dzilak rok, jo resnaki partziani, es esmu ierakusies, bet jamegina izrakties aaraa un noapaloties, lai cik tas gruti ari nebutu

Ir 5d vakars un man pa visu ekraanu: Are diatoms good integrators of temporal variability in stream water quality?


(Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)


[info]honeybee
2020-03-07 08:37 (saite)
Dievs!!!

(Atbildēt uz šo)


Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?