Kāpēc LV nevar būt tik progresīva un, teiksim, trūcīgā pabalstu izmaksāt nevis naudā, bet precēs. Izsniegtu kaut kādu karti, kurā būtu kaut kāda "nauda" vai "kuponi" un šo karti ņemtu pretī Rimi, Maxima un pāķu ķēžu veikali (Aibe, Elvi) un tad cilvēki varētu par tiem kuponiem dabūt pretī paiku, ko viņi paši izvēlas (izņemot alko un cigaretes un odekolonus). Tad atkristu problēma, ka pārtikas pakas trūcīgajiem nav diez ko jēdzīgas. Un visādi šitie trūcīgie un bezdarbnieki kaut kādā brīdī varētu tikt likti pie darba (audzēt dārzeņus, pļaut grāvjmalas gar ceļiem, kopt vistas,u.tml., ko pēc tam izmantot priekš pašiem/citiem trūcīgajiem/bezdarbniekiem).
Un kāpēc LV nevar būt tik progresīva un koncentrēties uz izglītības sistēmas uzlabošanu, tā vietā, lai taisītu kaut kādu tīmbildingu (uz papīra, protams) valsts mērogā, kā rezultātā latvieši un krievi tiks saliedēti.

"In New Mexico we have food stamps that are on a debit card with a maximum amount that was calculated by family size and children. The children are expected to go to school and the adults are expected to look for work. We have a plan for electric and gas called LIHEAP Low income heating and gas help capped at what you qualify for. There is also the expectation that these adults will give back to the community by devoting different amounts of community service in schools, libraries or places they may be needed. Once they start working the ebt stamps and the community service amounts go down. I found this out by working with low income parents at the schools. We also offer free breakfast and lunch at school and in the summer free lunches at community centers and parks. Our people don't get near the benefits in cash that you do. We have section 8 living where the rent is about half the going rate. We are trying to get people to work, even if it is minimum wage." (no The Sunday Times komentāriem).