gnidrologs (![[info]](http://klab.lv/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} gnidrologs) rakstīja,@ 2020-03-22 12:12:00 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
But either way, his (šajā gadūjumā par Haidnu) music shows the problem with humanistic art because unless the work in question is a masterpiece there's really little value to a composition (as a vast number of his symphonies demonstrate, since most of them were written to be "enjoyed" for a bit and then forgotten) where as in sacred art it is the form itself that carries all the meaning hence why the concept of the genius didn't exist in the middle ages, and why there are no "trivial" works in sacred art, regardless of the skill or genius of the individual artist. Every cathedral is a masterwork, every sacred icon is fully capable of conveying the deeper meaning this art was intended to express.
Nopūsties:
