Nejūtas apvainoti, jo ''low IQ'' vai ''low self awareness''. Nēģeri un sievietes. Culprit obvious.:)

Un ne jau par to tikai stāsts. Simulatori, īpaši tie, kas cenšas atainot kādu rīl laif vai, teiksim, kino/komiksgrāmatu/literatūras personāžu iekš datorspēles tiek gaidīti kā ''fair depiction''. Ja tu gaidi spēli par Betmenu tu gaidi Betmenu, nevis Betwoman. Ja gribi uztaisīt Betwoman vai Betgirl personāžu - lūdzu. Bet taisi to nulles un pats, nevis haidžeko daudziem cilvēkiem iemīļotu franšīži, sporta veidu vai kas nu pagadās un mākslīgi iesmuglē tur ideju, ka Betmens patiesība bija sieviete, vai pilnīgu absurdu, ko autors parādīja ar F1 simulatoru. Nu nav sieviešu F1. Nah viņas tur ieliktas? Vienīgais iemesls kāpēc šādi fenomeni notiek ir tas, ka leftardi jūt nicinājumu pret savām ''victim grupām'', tāpēc cenšas salāpīt savu white/male un kādu tur vēl vainas sajūtu ar šādiem aktiem. Dabiski, ka tas vairāk pārāda nevis nēģeru vai sieviešu inferioritāti tajā vai citā sfērā, bet kultūrmarksistu un viņu noderīgo idiotu ārprātu. Daudziem nepatīk, ka es mēdzu citēt unabomberi, jo dabiski, ka viņa darbības ir nosodāmas, bet viņš ļoti labi noķēra šo te kreisās idejas absurditāti:

229. The leftist is oriented toward large-scale collectivism. He emphasizes the duty of the individual to serve society and the duty of society to take care of the individual. He has a negative attitude toward individualism. He often takes a moralistic tone. He tends to be for gun control, for sex education and other psychologically “enlightened” educational methods, for social planning, for affirmative action, for multiculturalism. He tends to identify with victims. He tends to be against competition and against violence, but he often finds excuses for those leftists who do commit violence. He is fond of using the common catch- phrases of the left, like “racism,” “sexism,” “homophobia,” “capitalism,” “imperialism,” “neocolonialism,” “genocide,” “social change,” “social justice,” “social responsibility.” Maybe the best diagnostic trait of the leftist is his tendency to sympathize with the following movements: feminism, gay rights, ethnic rights, disability rights, animal rights, political correctness. Anyone who strongly sympathizes with ALL of these movements is almost certainly a leftist. [36]

230. The more dangerous leftists, that is, those who are most power-hungry, are often characterized by arrogance or by a dogmatic approach to ideology. However, the most dangerous leftists of all may be certain oversocialized types who avoid irritating displays of aggressiveness and refrain from advertising their leftism, but work quietly and unobtrusively to promote collectivist values, “enlightened” psychological techniques for socializing children, dependence of the individual on the system, and so forth. These crypto- leftists (as we may call them) approximate certain bourgeois types as far as practical action is concerned, but differ from them in psychology, ideology and motivation. The ordinary bourgeois tries to bring people under control of the system in order to protect his way of life, or he does so simply because his attitudes are conventional. The crypto-leftist tries to bring people under control of the system because he is a True Believer in a collectivistic ideology. The crypto-leftist is differentiated from the average leftist of the oversocialized type by the fact that his rebellious impulse is weaker and he is more securely socialized. He is differentiated from the ordinary well-socialized bourgeois by the fact that there is some deep lack within him that makes it necessary for him to devote himself to a cause and immerse himself in a collectivity. And maybe his (well-sublimated) drive for power is stronger than that of the average bourgeois.


Beisiklī problēma ir nevis rasēs, dzimumos un citās ''upurgrupās'', bet cilvēkos, kas cenšas viņu kukuragā haidžekot civilizāciju.