Skabičevskis (![[info]](http://klab.lv/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} begemots) rakstīja, |
Super!
Vai es pareizi saprotu, ka "[The authors know exactly what they are doing, and they are clearly enjoying every second of it.] They explain that given what we now know about polygenicity, the highest-effect-size depression genes require samples of about 34,000 people to detect, and so any study with fewer than 34,000 people that says anything about specific genes is almost definitely a false positive;"
nozīmē, ka ņemot vērā jebkura konkrēta gēna izplatību, var pateikt, kāds ir minimālais sample size, lai vispār kaut ko par šo gēnu secināt?
Vai es pareizi saprotu, ka "[The authors know exactly what they are doing, and they are clearly enjoying every second of it.] They explain that given what we now know about polygenicity, the highest-effect-size depression genes require samples of about 34,000 people to detect, and so any study with fewer than 34,000 people that says anything about specific genes is almost definitely a false positive;"
nozīmē, ka ņemot vērā jebkura konkrēta gēna izplatību, var pateikt, kāds ir minimālais sample size, lai vispār kaut ko par šo gēnu secināt?
Nopūsties:
