Skabičevskis ([info]begemots) rakstīja,
Man šķiet amerikāņiem ir diezgan laba vārda brīvības koncepcija:

At either rate, the U.S. is unique among Liberal Democracies in that the U.S. has no "Hate Speech" laws. That is to say that there are no laws criminalizing speech that is offensive to people by protected characteristics. That said, Hate Crimes do exists, which is a charge that can be applied to any crime where it is clear that the victim being targeted for protect characteristics whether they are perceived or otherwise (it doesn't matter if an Anti-Islam mob attacked a Sikh thinking they were Muslim, it still counts. Wrong for the wrong reasons is still wrong.). In this context, slurs may be considered as evidence in and of themselves, but the crime isn't their use in the attack, it's the attack itself.

https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/74075/what-are-the-limits-of-free-speech-when-referring-to-a-person-in-the-us/74078#74078


(Lasīt komentārus)

Nopūsties:

No:
( )Anonīms- ehh.. šitajam cibiņam netīk anonīmie, nesanāks.
Lietotājvārds:
Parole:
Temats:
Tematā HTML ir aizliegts
  
Ziņa:
Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?