zazis ([info]zazis) rakstīja,
this would make nuclear even more expensive and unprofitable than it already is!!!1
nē tu izrāvi no konteksta. jo tā tev patīk darīt. un tik stumt savu.

"Renewables are cheapest when they can be used directly. If you can use lots of them to cover the direct consumption, more energy is produced at a lower price. Instead, when you using it for storage, it's more expensive, because storage costs will be added. If renewables can be used to cover the entire load when available, the ratio of a plant of direct usage/indirect usage is bigger, thus the energy will be cheaper. But if nuclear covers the base load, the same energy can not be used from renewables production, thus lowering that ratio and making renewables more expensive. Of course you could say that the nuclear energy goes into storages, when renewables are available, but this would make nuclear even more expensive and unprofitable than it already is."


(Lasīt komentārus)

Nopūsties:

No:
( )Anonīms- ehh.. šitajam cibiņam netīk anonīmie, nesanāks.
Lietotājvārds:
Parole:
Temats:
Tematā HTML ir aizliegts
  
Ziņa:

Gandrīz jau aizmirsu pateikt – šis lietotājs ir ieslēdzis IP adrešu noglabāšanu. Operatore Nr. 65.
Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?