> bet kur tad mums "sievišķīgas" vai "vīrišķīgas" smadzenes?

Es pieņemu, viņš domā kaut ko no šā (citāts no viņa paša raksta kopsavilkuma, kas minēts linkā):

"Here I provide few examples I am aware of, which demonstrate clinical importance from a biomedical perspective. It has been shown that the brains of homosexual males respond differently to anti-depressant fluoxetine compared to the brains of heterosexual males, where the hypothalamus responded less to the antidepressant in the homosexual male group. This result indicates different activity of the serotonergic system and possibly of noradrenergic and dopaminergic systems as well. Authors of the study point out that clinically the main difference could be seen in the side effects of the antidepressant between homosexuals and heterosexuals". Nu, un tur tālāk.

> Plus seksualitātei piedēvēt tikai vairošanās funkciju sugai, kas to acīmredzami izmanto izklaidei un socializācijai, arī kaut kā neprecīzi

Izklausās pēc biologa skatu punkta. :)