None of the Above ([info]artis) rakstīja,
@ 2018-04-10 10:18:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
"Russia has three motorized rifle brigades, one motorized regiment, and three airborne regiments based within close proximity to the Baltic states, according to open source reporting. Those forces are distributed within mainland Russia as well as Russia’s Kaliningrad exclave.

The special operations-heavy makeup of Russian forces within striking range of the Baltics telegraphs a readiness for the type of hybrid warfare assaults Russia conducted in Crimea and eastern Ukraine, the report by Harris and Kagan said.

“Russian military leadership, practice, and ad hoc deployment along the Baltic borders all suggest Putin is much more likely to pursue a hybrid approach in the Baltic over a conventional mechanized invasion,” they wrote.

Thus, to launch a conventional invasion of the Baltics, Russian commanders would have to shift mechanized forces from other locations in Russia toward the region, and expose Kaliningrad to a NATO counterattack.

With its constellation of spy satellites and other reconnaissance assets, NATO would notice Russia internally reinforcing its military forces on a scale required to mount a successful land invasion of the Baltics, thereby betraying the element of surprise.

“There are three mechanized divisions near the Ukrainian border compared to just one airborne division near the Baltic, which would not be optimal for large-scale mechanized offensives,” Harris and Kagan wrote.

“The West would be foolish to over-focus on any one form of possible future war with Russia,” Harris and Kagan wrote in their report, adding that the deployment of NATO armor and airpower to build a defensive bulwark against a Russian land invasion of the Baltics may not be an effective deterrent.

Many Western military analysts say that Russia’s war in Ukraine is a case study in Moscow’s contemporary “hybrid warfare” doctrine. Therefore, along that line of thinking, Western military leaders would be wise to study Russian tactics in Ukraine to anticipate how a hypothetical Russian hybrid assault on a Baltic country would play out.

When he was U.S. president, Barack Obama levied punitive economic sanctions against Moscow for its military aggression in Ukraine. Obama also kick-started the U.S. military’s pivot to Eastern Europe.

The Trump administration, however, has taken a tougher stance against Russia in both Ukraine and across Eastern Europe. Notably, it has approved the delivery of American anti-tank weapons to Ukraine and upped the budget for U.S. military operations in Eastern Europe to deter Russia.

The formidable U.S. Javelin anti-tank missiles—set for delivery to Ukraine this year—won’t be enough to tip the balance of power in Ukraine’s favor should Russia invade. Yet, the Javelins will increase the cost in blood and treasure that Russia would suffer in such a war.

More importantly, Trump’s decision to supply Kyiv with lethal weapons underscores both a commitment to Ukraine’s security as well as a commitment to deter Russia in Eastern Europe more broadly.

That’s a message, many believe, that Moscow is sure to consider when plotting its next move.

“Ukraine’s struggle against Russian revanchism is NATO’s,” Clark and Karber wrote. “It’s time the West recognize that.”"

https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/03/26/nato-braces-putins-next-military-move-eastern-europe/


(Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)


[info]saturday
2018-04-10 12:21 (saite)
pagaidi, ko? Krievija izmantos hibrīdkara pieeju, ne "konvencionālās kara stratēģijas", kuras mēs ar OMD, kurā cilvēku tiktu apmācīti "asimetriskās kara metodēs" - "uzbrukšanā no slēpņiem, sabotāžā, partizānu lietās" varētu uzvarēt? nu fak, ko tagad?
hehe

(Atbildēt uz šo)


[info]gnidrologs
2018-04-10 19:08 (saite)
Vai tu šobrīd nopietni gaidi drīzu atklātu agresiju no rašas puses un karu?

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Diskusija)


[info]artis
2018-04-10 20:51 (saite)
Nē, aizklātu agresiju. Tikai un vienīgi aizklātu, kuru, izmantojot izdevīgu brīdi, var eskalēt citos agresijas veidos. Maskirovka.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)


[info]gnidrologs
2018-04-10 21:32 (saite)
Bet tu pamatā citē rakstus par to kā NATO to un šito un kā tur kas deplojo kādus spēkus kur un visādu tml. taktisku figņu. Okej, šis nav atbilstošākais ieraksts. Tas, ka Krievija dzen visāda veida propagandu un melo ir fakts kopš forever. Vai kaut kas radikāli mainās? Kādu vēl agresiju izņemot propagandisku un provokatorisku, bet kas nav bruņota sadursme, var gaidīt?

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)


[info]artis
2018-04-10 23:34 (saite)
Provokācija var pāraugt konvencionāla spēka pielietošanā, kad ir sasniegts "īstais brīdis". Man taču tev tas nav jāskaidro. Tāpēc arī NATO "deplojo spēkus" kā atturēšanas daļu. Kas mainās? Krievija ir palikusi ambiciozāka un agresīvāka, to taču visi ir pamanījuši. Meli un "активные мероприятия" nav tik nevainīgi instrumenti, tas tiešām var novest pie totāla cluster fuck.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais) (Diskusija)


[info]gnidrologs
2018-04-11 00:34 (saite)
Var jau būt. Neesmu diez ko sekojis Krievijai pēdējā laikā un dažu labu Rietumu politisko spēku Krievijas bubuļa izmantošana priekš iekšējām politiskām razborkām mazliet aizmiglo īsto bildi bildi.

(Atbildēt uz šo) (Iepriekšējais)


Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?