Tiesas spriedums angļu valodā
« previous entry | next entry »
Feb. 24., 2009 | 10:26 am
posted by: stihija in pajautaa
Droši vien jautājums juristiem.
Ko tiesas spriedumā nozīmē vārdi "Holds..." un "Joins to the merits...", ja runa ir tieši par gala sprieduma pasludināšanu, Eiropas Cilvēktiesību tiesā. T.i., kurš termins nozīmē, ka lēmums ir par sliktu Latvijas valstij, un kurš nozīmē, ka ir par labu Latvijas valstij?
Ko tiesas spriedumā nozīmē vārdi "Holds..." un "Joins to the merits...", ja runa ir tieši par gala sprieduma pasludināšanu, Eiropas Cilvēktiesību tiesā. T.i., kurš termins nozīmē, ka lēmums ir par sliktu Latvijas valstij, un kurš nozīmē, ka ir par labu Latvijas valstij?
from:
pzrk
date: Feb. 24., 2009 - 10:55 am
#
Atbildēt | Diskusija
from:
stihija
date: Feb. 24., 2009 - 11:42 am
#
3. Declares the application admissible;
4. Holds that there has been no violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention;
5. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and that no separate issue arises under Article 13 of the Convention;
6. Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicant, within three months from the date on which the judgment becomes final in accordance with Article 44 § 2 of the Convention EUR 8,000 (eight thousand euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable, in respect of non-pecuniary damage;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;
7. Dismisses the remainder of the applicant's claim for just satisfaction.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 14 October 2008, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Atbildēt | Iepriekšējais | Diskusija
from:
puuce
date: Feb. 24., 2009 - 02:00 pm
#
Atbildēt | Iepriekšējais | Diskusija
from:
stihija
date: Feb. 24., 2009 - 02:51 pm
#
Atbildēt | Iepriekšējais | Diskusija
from:
puuce
date: Feb. 24., 2009 - 06:45 pm
#
Atbildēt | Iepriekšējais | Diskusija
from:
stihija
date: Feb. 25., 2009 - 09:04 am
#
nu jā, paldies.
Atbildēt | Iepriekšējais | Diskusija
from:
puuce
date: Feb. 25., 2009 - 10:13 am
#
Holds that there has been a violation = nolemj, ka IR pārkāpts
Atbildēt | Iepriekšējais