From: ieva	Date: 22. Februāris 2010 - 23:20		(Pastāvīgā saite)

negribi konkrētu kontekstu iedot?

From: anna	Date: 23. Februāris 2010 - 00:02		(Pastāvīgā saite)

All rites are in the final analysis like passage rites which are composed of three states: separation/the pre-liminal, the liminal and aggregation/post liminal.
The liminal state is transgressive in nature, it is anti-structural. "Temporary antinomic liberation from behaviour norms and cognitive rules places participants outside the bounds of structural constraints." Li minality is very closely related to free play. Ritual liminality opens up a space in which participants are free to formulate a potentially unlimited series of alternative social arrangements. In the liminal state, a new
reality is in the process of negotiation, and the participants are
baptized directly in the creative force of nature alive but once socially suppressed within each participant.

	From: ieva	Date: 23. Februāris 2010 - 01:28		(Pastāvīgā saite)

jā...es jau paspēju sadzerties, neko vairs nesaprotu :P bet pirmā doma, kas man bija, kad vēl pamanījos uzdot tev jautājumu par kontekstu, bija "robežstāvoklis".

From: anna	Date: 23. Februāris 2010 - 02:54		(Pastāvīgā saite)

paldies! laikam jau ir tā, kā watt teica, ka tas ir robežstāvoklis starp zemapziņu un bezapziņu.

From: marta_trauma	Date: 24. Februāris 2010 - 00:10		(Pastāvīgā saite)

kāda ir atšķirība starp zemapziņu un bezapziņu?