ļoti patīk tao lin
“I dislike [specific book or story]” can be a fact; “[specific book or story] is [abstraction, such as ‘bad’ or ‘good’ or 'important’]” can not be a fact unless a context/goal has been defined and calculations have been made to discern if [specific book or story] benefits the goal, or not, taking into account a limited context of a range of time and area of space. Saying “[specific book or story] is [abstraction]” without adding “to me”/“in my view” or without defining a context/goal is like saying “I am the only person who exists and my opinions are facts” or “I am the entire universe and the universe is not indifferent but actually makes value judgments on specific parts of itself without knowing for what goal the specific part is valuable within what temporal and spatial context.”

iz esejas par viena cilvēka veiktu slepkavību fenomenu - http://www.taolin.info/cho

pati eseja rezonē ar to, ko šeit runājām ar gudrākiem cibiņiem - http://klab.lv/~sirualsirual/74024.html