"does he still think we just did it by accident"

Yes, he still thinks that. In the video he still implies that most of the people who didn't get the shots were not smart but lucky. He says that all the smart people were analytical in their decision to get the shots based upon the early data (provided by the very people that were to benefit financially/politically from it), and the REALLY SMART PEOPLE (like him) changed their minds once the "signals" and data showed danger and refused to get the boosters. What he fails to see is that intelligence isn't just about analyzing the available data. A huge component of intelligence is intuition/skepticism, risk/benefit analysis, and just trusting your instincts. Anyone who looked at the extremely lacking safety testing, trusted the pharma/political/media messaging, examined their risk, and still failed to have a wait and see approach cannot lay claim to being "very intelligent."