an expert is one who knows the disease; this would exclude most doctors and health officials since they have not treated such patients. Even those who are familiar with the disease in adults acknowledge that what they know changes and is being contradicted over time.

since there are differences of opinion amongst the “experts”, there is no “opinion of the experts”

a person is not obligated to put himself in possible danger in order to save another from certain danger.” With COVID the danger is not certain, so there is no obligation to put one’s self in a possible danger.

^^^ šim jāatrod LV likumu ekvivalents

one who vaccinates a child and causes death is responsible for that injury as a murderer. He cannot say “I went with the opinion of experts who say it is a life preserving substance, and not a deadly poison.”

skaisti, vēl vajadzētu maskas pielīdzināt child abuse

https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/frontlinenews/jewish-court-rules-covid-shots-for-children-not-obligatory-while-one-who-vaccinates-a-child-and-causes-death-is-responsible-as-a-murderer