Skabičevskis ([info]begemots) rakstīja,
bs.

sāksim ar to, ka F35 ir vairāk orientēts uz gaiss-gaiss scenārijiem.

bet pat gadījumos, kad tam ir jādauza zemes mērķi, tas to tipiski dara stipri ārpus stingera attāluma:

With a SDB II (GBU-53), an F-35 or other fighter with the right sensors, can hit within 1m of a target from up to 72km away and will will destroy or disable vehicles within a 10m radius. It's kill radius will naturally differ based on environment, but you could easily expect soldiers to be incapacitated or killed at twice that.

Nospiedoša daļa no Afganistānas karā nošautajiem lidaparātiem bija helīši (Soviet aircraft losses in Afghanistan), kurus tad arī labi var stingerot.

Skat. arī, piem. F-35 loss/exchange ratio, kur uzsver, ka galvenais ir ieturēt distanci:

[..] in a close-turning dogfight with modern missiles, even a 1960s-era fighter such as the F-4 can get into a "mutual kill scenario" at close range with a fourth generation fighter. That’s why the F-35 was provided with the ability to fuse sensor information from many sources, triangulating with other F-35s to locate, identify, and fire on enemy aircraft before they are able to shoot back.


(Lasīt komentārus)

Nopūsties:

No:
Lietotājvārds:
Parole:
Ievadi te 'qws' (liidzeklis pret spambotiem):
Temats:
Tematā HTML ir aizliegts
  
Ziņa:

Gandrīz jau aizmirsu pateikt – šis lietotājs ir ieslēdzis IP adrešu noglabāšanu. Operatore Nr. 65.
Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?