Well hello.

Seeing as you asked.

I would say for me, it happened after the banking crisis. Up until that point I had fairly, I suppose, mainstream opinions - slightly left of centre, but nothing remarkable. After 2008/9, I learned the world worked entirely differently from how I had assumed (and I had thought I was a reasonably educated person). A lot of people tried to - while I was going through the process of understanding how the banking system actually worked - belittle me, mock me and so on, so I am kind of used to being patronised or treated like some bizarre but unpleasant specimin.

So, since then I have become very sceptical and critical of the 'intelligently-held viewpoint', that you would get from - well the kinds of media I had been getting my information from - and maybe you get yours from currently (just speculating).

That scepticism has informed my 'analysis' of the veracity of the official line on the Cvd business. I have a lot of unanswered questions, two of which I asked today - to no response so far.

I could give a list here, but I don't know how interested you are.

In short, and in response to an earlier comment, I think that coerced vaccines for a virus that has resulted in no excess all-cause mortality for under 80's (see an earlier post where I went to the trouble of collating the information for the last 10 years) is crazy, especially when you consider that the vaccines have emergency (or conditional) approval only, and have - obviously - not undergone long-term trials.

Restrictions on the unvaccinated would surpass any existing ones based on current vaccine passports. At the moment, I can't travel to some places if, for example, I am not vaccinated against Yellow Fever. Now, if I don't want an experimental vaccine, I may be prohibited from a range of day-to-day activities in the country I am living in. Slightly different from an annual chest x-ray, I hope you would agree.

That's enough, I think, for now.