atbildot uz jautajumu,
- paradibu izteikt ar indeksu (stavoklis, sekas)
- tad petit to ietekmejosos celonjfaktorus, bet tur peta katra faktora darbibu atseviski un mijiedarbibaa

viekarsots piemers: resnumu izsakaa indeksu BMI un tad peeta kadi faktori ietekmee BMI

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Lūk, mani interesē, kā tāds BMI (vai cits indekss) atgriezeniski savukārt ietekmē situāciju. Piemēram, kā GDP internacionāla pieņemšana un izmantošana “piegriež” izpratni par to, kas strādā, radot izmešu kultūru: “Simon Kuznets, the guy who designed the GDP measurement tool to calculate the productivity capacity of the United States during WW2, warned against using this system as a broad economic indicator. Yet very quickly, nations around the world took to measuring their economic position through the calculation of the sale of end-user goods. Basically, anything that you or I consume is considered a ‘good’ in the economy and thus adds to the health of the countries’ economic positions. This means that wars increase GDP, as does anything that requires continual consumption, like disposable stuff.”

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

"Tik nenormāli sūdīgs BMI, ka jānoslīcina bēda ar sešiem aliņiem!" :D

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Aptuveni, vai kaut kā tā, tikai lielākos apmēros.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

nu kaa ! ja BMI > 25, jasaak dieta, ja BMI > 40, jaasaak piespiedu dieta, ja BMI < 18, jaasaak pacients barot - indeksu jeega ir tada, ka var nolikt robezas un tad management actions

(Reply to this) (Parent)

par GDP - interpretacijas jautajums, vajag pareizi interpreteet

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Vajag, vajag, bet tas tomēr nav noticis.

(Reply to this) (Parent)