gnidrologs ([info]gnidrologs) rakstīja,
@ 2019-10-07 23:23:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
viva la snackbar
It turns out that the French government and the higher ups at the police actively pushed the "work place tragedy" narrative to cover up that they knew that it was likely a terror attack motivated by islam.
Apparently they feared that this would further alienate the police force and also cast a bad light on an immigration debate in the parliament on Monday.

The guy had raised several red flags so far, including justifying the Charlie Hebdo attacks, but was allowed to keep his security clearance, which gave him access to secret material concerning terror suspects and terrorists including those who participated in the Charlie Hebdo attacks. He also had access to private information, including home addresses of police officers, which is an especially sensitive issue for the French police, because three years ago, two police officers had been killed in their own home by an islamist.

It's reported that several police officers were urged by their bosses to not talk about islamist related suspicions, but refused to do so.


Nez kas šeit ir smieklīgāks. Auklēšanās ap diversity hire tik augstā un security sensitive līmenī "lai tikai mūs nesauktu par -istiem un -fobiem", kas beigās maksāja kārtējās dzīvības vai fakts, ka viens dindu akbars spēja kazuāli nodurt 4 mentus, kas parāda cik bezjēdzīgas ir rietumu mentūras. Good riddance. Jo vairāk snakbāru Rietumu mentūrās u.c. iestādēs, jo labāk.


(Ierakstīt jaunu komentāru)

Neesi iežurnalējies. Iežurnalēties?