 | Hedera helix L. ( hedera) rakstīja, |
"Jā tajā Britannica versijā ir mēģināts pamatot ka Hitlers nav sociālists jo bijis pret marksismu un vajājis komunistus."
Kārtējais gnidrologa cienīgais gājiens. Kāda jēga tev piegādāt informācjas avotus, ja tu tos nelasi?
To say that Hitler understood the value of language would be an enormous understatement. Propaganda played a significant role in his rise to power. To that end, he paid lip service to the tenets suggested by a name like National Socialist German Workers’ Party, but his primary—indeed, sole—focus was on achieving power whatever the cost and advancing his racist, anti-Semitic agenda.
...
By the late 1920s, however, with the German economy in free fall, Hitler had enlisted support from wealthy industrialists who sought to pursue avowedly anti-socialist policies. Otto Strasser soon recognized that the Nazis were neither a party of socialists nor a party of workers, and in 1930 he broke away to form the anti-capitalist Schwarze Front (Black Front).
...
Hitler allied himself with leaders of German conservative and nationalist movements, and in January 1933 German President Paul von Hindenburg appointed him chancellor. Hitler’s Third Reich had been born, and it was entirely fascist in character. Within two months Hitler achieved full dictatorial power through the Enabling Act. In April 1933 communists, socialists, democrats, and Jews were purged from the German civil service, and trade unions were outlawed the following month.
Politiskā partijā, kas bīda bagātniekiem izdevīgu politiku un aizliedz arodbiedrības, ir burtiski un nepārspīlējot tieši pretējais tam, ko dara sociālisti. Tas, ka partija savā nosaukumā izmanto maldinošus saukļus, arī nav nekas pārsteidzošs. Partijas pozīciju politiskajā spektrā nenosaka nosaukums, bet gan politiskās nostādnes, ko tā atbalsta un virza. Es atceros, ka mums šito skaidroja jau 9. klasē, kad mācījāmies 20.gs. vēsturi, kas nozīmē, ka principā tu nespētu sekmīgi pabeigt pamatskolu. :D
(Lasīt komentārus)
Nopūsties: