'Nav smadzeņu - nav subjekta.'

Oh come on - enough with this unscientific nonsense.

Ta ait kaa taas smadzenes magjiski izpukshkjinaatos no zila gaisa. Jeij bogu, tas man atgaadina gender iedology malziet - tev ir pupi, tad tu esi sieviete, nav pupu tad tikmeer viirietis.

You should actually listen to some anti-abortion debaters, kam IR actual zinaatniska informaacija par to kas ir cilveeks.

Protams, pavisam cita lieta ir nostaaja - cilveeks bez smadzenju vai ar ierobezhotu smadzenju funkciju (kas jau ir DAUDZ mazaak kaa embrijs ar 100% POTENCIAALU uz smadzenju funkciju) nav svariigs un var tikt nogalinaats bez kriminaalaam sekaam.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Labrīt, methodrone!
Vai tu pirmo reizi ktuloha murgus lasi?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Nee, bet dazhreiz ir dzinulis izlabot nepatiesiibas, pat ja tas ir futile. Existential obligation innit.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Tāpēc parasti ir 12 nedēļu limits [ar drošības intervālu] => tur tiek ņemts vērā ka smadzenes attīstās pakāpeniski bet pirms 12 nedēļām tur toč nekādu smadzeņu nav.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Phew, thank god its so straightforward. Honestly, what is science fussing about. Clearly there is no trace of human value before that. More women should consider killing those parasite clump cells they occasionally get in their uteruses from sex, its just so inconvenient and uncomfortable and prevents them from contributing to gdp and having even more sex with different men and also doing drugs.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Kontrecepcijas protams ir labāk jo jebkurš aborts ir invazīva procedūra, asiņošanas, infekcijas risks.

(Reply to this) (Parent)